Файл: Doicu A., Wriedt T., Eremin Y.A. Light scattering by systems of particles (OS 124, Springer, 2006.pdf

ВУЗ: Не указан

Категория: Не указан

Дисциплина: Не указана

Добавлен: 28.06.2024

Просмотров: 864

Скачиваний: 0

ВНИМАНИЕ! Если данный файл нарушает Ваши авторские права, то обязательно сообщите нам.

198 3 Simulation Results

3.2.4 CST Microwave Studio Program

CST Microwave Studio is a commercial software package which can be used for analyzing the electromagnetic scattering by particles with complex geometries and optical properties. Essentially, the electromagnetic simulator is based on the finite integration technique (FIT) developed by Weiland [260]. The finite integration technique is simple in concept and provides a discrete reformulation of Maxwell’s equations in their integral from. Following the analysis of Clemens and Weiland [38] we recall the basic properties of the discrete representation of Maxwell’s equation by the finite integration technique.

The first discretization step of the finite integration method consists in the restriction of the electromagnetic field problem, which represent an open boundary problem, to a simply connected and bounded space domain containing the region of interest. The next step consists in the decomposition of the computational domain into a finite number of volume elements (cells). This decomposition yields the volume element complex G, which serves as computational grid. Assuming that is brick-shaped, we have the volume element complex

G= {Dijk /Dijk = [xi, xi+1] × [yj , yj+1] × [zk , zk+1]

i = 1, 2, . . . , Nx 1, j = 1, 2, . . . , Ny 1, k = 1, 2, . . . , Nz 1} ,

and note that each edge and facet of the volume elements are associated with a direction.

Next, we consider the integral form of the Maxwell equations, i.e., for Faraday’s induction law and Maxwell–Ampere law we integrate the di erential equations on an open surface and apply the Stokes theorem, while for Gauss’ electric and magnetic field laws we integrate the di erential equations on a bounded domain and use the Gauss theorem.

The Faraday law in integral form

>

∂B

· dS

E · ds =

 

 

S ∂t

∂S

 

 

 

with S being an arbitrary open surface contained in , can be rewritten for the facet Sz,ijk of the volume element Dijk as the ordinary di erential equation

d

ex,ijk + ey,i+1jk − ex,ij+1k − ey,ijk = dt bz,ijk ,

where

(xi+1,yj ,zk )

ex,ijk =

E · ds

 

(xi ,yj ,zk )

is the electric voltage along the edge Lx,ijk of the facet Sz,ijk , and



3.2 Electromagnetics Programs

199

Y

 

ex,ij+1k

by,ij+1

 

bz,ijk-1

 

 

 

bx,ijk

bx,i+1jk X

 

ey,ijk

 

Z

 

ey,i+1jk

ex,ijk

by,ijk

 

 

bz,ijk

Fig. 3.1. Electric voltages and magnetic fluxes on a volume element

 

 

bz,ijk =

Sz,ijk B · dS

represents the magnetic flux through the facet Sz,ijk . Note that the orientation of the element edges influences the signs in the di erential equation (Fig. 3.1). The Gauss magnetic field law in integral form

B · dS = 0

S

with S being an arbitrary closed surface contained in , yields for the boundary surface of the volume element Dijk ,

−bx,ijk + bx,i+1jk − by,ijk + by,ij+1k − bz,ijk + bz,ijk+1 = 0 .

The discretization of the remaining two Maxwell equations requires the introduction of a second volume element complex G, which is the dual of the primary volume element complex G. For the Cartesian tensor product grid G, the dual grid G is defined by taking the foci of the volume elements of G as gridpoints for the volume elements of G. With this definition there is a one- to-one relation between the element edges of G cutting through the element surfaces of G and conversely. For the dual volume elements, the Maxwell– Ampere law

>

 

∂D

+ J

· dS ,

H · ds =

 

 

S

∂t

∂S

 

 

 

 

and the Gauss electric field law

 

 

 

 

D · dS = ρ dV , S = ∂D

S D


200 3 Simulation Results

are discretized in an analogous manner. The di erential equations are formulated in terms of the magnetic grid voltages hα,ijk along the dual edges Lα,ijk , the dielectric fluxes dα,ijk and the conductive currents jα,ijk through the dual facets Sα,ijk , α = x, y, z, and the electric charge qijk in the dual

volume element Dijk (qijk =

ρdV ).

 

Dijk

 

 

Collecting the equations of all element surfaces of the complex pair {G, G} and introducing the integral voltage-vectors e and h, the flux state-vectors b and d, the conductive current-vector j, and the electric charge-vector q, we derive a set of discrete matrix equations, the so-called Maxwell grid equations

 

d

 

 

d

Ce =

 

b ,

Ch

=

 

d + j

dt

dt

and

 

 

 

 

Sb = 0 ,

Sd

= q .

The transformation into frequency domain for the Maxwell grid equations with e(t) = Re{eejωt}, yields

Ce = jωb , Ch = jωd + j .

The discrete curl-matrices C and C, and the discrete divergence matrices S and S are defined on the grids G and G, respectively, and depend only on the grid topology. The integral voltageand flux state-variables allocated on the two di erent volume element complexes are related to each other by the discrete material matrix relations

d = M εe + p , j = M κe , h = M ν b − m ,

where M ε is the permittivity matrix, M κ is the matrix of conductivities, M ν is the matrix of reluctivities, and p and m are the electric and magnetic polarization vectors, respectively. The discrete grid topology matrices have the same e ect as the vector operators curl and div. For instance, the discrete analog of the equation · × = 0 (div curl = 0) is SC = 0 and SC =

0. Transposition of these equations together with the relation between the

T

discrete curl-matrices C = C , yields the discrete equations CST = 0 and

T

CS = 0, both corresponding to the equation × = 0 (curl grad = 0). Basic algebraic properties of the Maxwell grid equations also allow to prove conservation properties with respect to energy and charges.

The finite integration technique su ers somewhat from a deficiency in being able to model very complicated cavities including curved boundaries with high precision, but the usage of the perfect boundary approximation eliminate this deficiency [123].


3.3 Homogeneous, Axisymmetric and Nonaxisymmetric Particles

201

3.3 Homogeneous, Axisymmetric

and Nonaxisymmetric Particles

In the following analysis we show results computed with the TAXSYM and TNONAXSYM routines. The flow diagram of these routines is shown in Fig. 3.2. The input data file provides the variables specifying the optical properties, geometry, type of discrete sources and error tolerances for the convergence tests over Nrank, Mrank and Nint. The model parameters control the interpolation and integration processes, and the solution of the linear system of equations. The current version of the TAXSYM code is directly applicable to spheroids, cylinders and rounded oblate cylinders. Nonaxisymmetric geometries currently supported include ellipsoids, quadratic prisms and regular polyhedral prisms. The user should be able to write new routines to generate particles with other shapes. The codes can also read particle geometry information from files instead of automatically generating one of the geometries listed above.

3.3.1 Axisymmetric Particles

The scattering characteristics of axisymmetric particles can be computed with localized or distributed sources. Specifically, localized sources are used to analyze the electromagnetic scattering by particles which are not too extreme in terms of size parameter and aspect ratio, while distributed sources are employed to compute the T matrix of large particles with extreme geometries. For highly elongated particles, the sources are distributed along the axis of symmetry, while for flattened particles, the sources are distributed in the complex plane.

Input Data

 

Model Control

 

Particle Geometry

 

Parameters

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

T-Matrix Routine

T Matrix

 

Scattering

 

Convergence Test

 

Characteristics

 

Results

 

 

 

Fig. 3.2. Flow diagram of TAXSYM and TNONAXSYM routines