Файл: Doicu A., Wriedt T., Eremin Y.A. Light scattering by systems of particles (OS 124, Springer, 2006.pdf
ВУЗ: Не указан
Категория: Не указан
Дисциплина: Не указана
Добавлен: 28.06.2024
Просмотров: 816
Скачиваний: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 Incident Field |
17 |
|
bmn = −4jn+1epol · nmn |
(β, α) |
|
|
|
|
||||||
= |
|
|
4jn+1 |
e |
τ |m|(β)e |
|
jmπ|m|(β)e |
e−jmα . |
(1.26) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
− 2n(n + 1) |
pol · |
n |
β − |
n |
α |
|
To give a justification of the above expansion we consider the integral representation
2π π
epol(β, α)ejke(β,α)·r = epol(β, α)ejk(β ,α )·r
00
×δ(α − α)δ(cos β − cos β) sin β dβ dα , (1.27)
and expand the tangential field |
|
||
f (β, α, β , α ) = epol(β, α)δ(α − α)δ(cos β − cos β) |
(1.28) |
||
in vector spherical harmonics |
|
||
1 |
∞ n |
|
|
|
|
||
f (β, α, β , α ) = |
|
amnmmn (β , α ) + jbmnnmn (β , α ) . (1.29) |
|
4πjn |
|||
|
|
n=1 m=−n |
|
Using the orthogonality relations of vector spherical harmonics we see that the expansion coe cients amn and bmn are given by
2π π
amn = 4jn f (β, α, β , α ) · mmn (β , α ) sin β dβ dα
00
=4jnepol(β, α) · mmn(β, α) ,
2π π
bmn = −4jn+1 |
f (β, α, β , α ) · nmn (β , α ) sin β dβ dα |
00
=−4jn+1epol(β, α) · nmn(β, α) .
Substituting (1.28) and (1.29) into (1.27) and taking into account the integral representations for the regular vector spherical wave functions (cf. (B.26) and (B.27)) yields (1.25).
The polarization unit vector of a linearly polarized vector plane wave is given by (1.18). If the vector plane wave propagates along the z-axis we have β = α = 0 and for β = 0, the spherical vector harmonics are zero unless m =
±1. Using the special values of the angular functions πn1 and τn1 when β = 0,
π1 |
(0) = τ 1 |
(0) = |
1 |
|
|
|
, |
|
n(n + 1)(2n + 1) |
||||||
|
|
||||||
n |
n |
|
2√2 |
we obtain
a±1n = −jn√2n + 1 (±j cos αpol + sin αpol) ,
b±1n = −jn+1√
18 1 Basic Theory of Electromagnetic Scattering
Thus, for a vector plane wave polarized along the x-axis we have = jn−1√2n + 1 ,
b1n = b−1n = jn−1√2n + 1 ,
while for a vector plane wave polarized along the y-axis we have
a1n = a−1n = jn−2√2n + 1 , b1n = −b−1n = jn−2√2n + 1 .
Gaussian Beam
Many optical particle sizing instruments and particle characterization methods are based on scattering by particles illuminated with laser beams. A laser beam has a Gaussian intensity distribution and the often used appellation Gaussian beam appears justified. A mathematical description of a Gaussian beam relies on Davis approximations [45]. An nth Davis beam corresponds to the first n terms in the series expansion of the exact solution to the Maxwell equations in power of the beam parameter s,
s = wl0 ,
where w0 is the waist radius and l is the di raction length, l = ksw02. According to Barton and Alexander [9], the first-order approximation is accurate to s < 0.07, while the fifth-order is accurate to s < 0.02, if the maximum percent error of the solution is less than 1.2%. Each nth Davis beam appears under three versions which are: the mathematical conservative version, the L-version and the symmetrized version [145]. None of these beams are exact solutions to the Maxwell equations, so that each nth Davis beam can be considered as a “pseudo-electromagnetic” field.
In the T -matrix method a Gaussian beam is expanded in terms of vector spherical wave functions by replacing the pseudo-electromagnetic field of an nth Davis beam by an equivalent electromagnetic field, so that both fields have the same values on a spherical surface [81, 83, 85]. As a consequence of the equivalence method, the expansion coe cients (or the beam shape coe cients) are computed by integrating the incident field over the spherical surface. Because these fields are rapidly varying, the evaluation of the coe cients by numerical integration requires dense grids in both the θ- and ϕ-direction and the computer run time is excessively long.
For weakly focused Gaussian beams, the generalized localized approximation to the beam shape coe cients represents a pleasing alternative (see, for instance, [84, 87]). The form of the analytical approximation was found in part by analogy to the propagation of geometrical light rays and in part by numerical experiments. This is not a rigorous method but its use simplifies and significantly speeds up the numerical computations. A justification of
1.2 Incident Field |
19 |
the localized approximations for both onand o -axis beams has been given by Lock and Gouesbet [145] and Gouesbet and Lock [82]. We note that the focused beam generated by the localized approximation is a good approximation to a Gaussian beam for s ≤ 0.1.
We consider the geometry depicted in Fig. 1.6 and assume that the middle of the beam waist is located at the point Ob. The particle coordinate system Oxyz and the beam coordinate system Obxbybzb have identical spatial orientation, and the position vector of the particle center O in the system Obxbybzb is denoted by r0. The Gaussian beam is of unit amplitude, propagates along the zb-axis and is linearly polarized along the xb-axis. In the particle coordinate system, the expansion of the Gaussian beam in vector spherical wave functions is given by
|
∞ n |
(ksr) + bmnN mn1 |
|
Ee(r) = |
amnM mn1 |
(ksr) , |
|
|
|
|
|
|
n=1 m=−n |
|
|
and the generalized localized approximation to the Davis first-order beam is
amn = KmnΨ0ejksz0
bmn = KmnΨ0ejksz0
xb
|
j(m |
− |
1)ϕ0 |
Jm−1 |
(u) − e |
j(m+1)ϕ0 |
|
e |
|
|
|
Jm+1 (u) , |
|||
|
j(m |
− |
1)ϕ0 |
Jm−1 |
(u) + e |
j(m+1)ϕ0 |
|
e |
|
|
|
Jm+1 (u) , |
|||
zb |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
z0 |
|
|
z |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O |
|
y |
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r0 |
|
|
|
|
2w0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ob |
|
|
|
|
|
yb |
|
|
|
|
ϕ0 |
ρ0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fig. 1.6. The particle coordinate system Oxyz and the beam coordinate system Oxbybzb have the same spatial orientation
20 |
1 Basic Theory of Electromagnetic Scattering |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
where (ρ0, ϕ0, z0) are the cylindrical coordinates of r0, |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
ρ02 + ρn2 |
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|||
|
Ψ0 = jQ exp −jQ |
|
|
, Q = |
|
, |
ρn = |
|
n + |
|
, |
|
w02 |
j − 2z0/l |
ks |
2 |
and
u = 2Q ρ0ρn .
w02
The normalization constant Kmn is given by
Kmn = 2jn n(n + 1)
2n + 1
for m = 0, and by
|
|
|
jn+|m| |
|
|
2n + 1 |
(n + m )! |
|
K |
|
= ( 1)|m| |
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
n(n + 1) · |
(n − |m|)! |
|||
|
mn |
− |
n + 21 |m|−1 |
|
|
for m = 0. If both coordinate systems coincide (ρ0 = 0), all expansion coe - cients are zero unless m = ±1 and
|
= |
|
1n = jn−1√ |
|
|
exp |
|
|
ρn2 |
|
|
||||
a1n |
a |
2n + 1 |
, |
||||||||||||
|
−w02 |
||||||||||||||
|
|
− − |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
= b |
|
= jn−1√ |
|
exp |
|
ρn2 |
. |
|
||||||
b |
|
2n + 1 |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
1n |
|
−1n |
|
|
|
|
|
−w02 |
|
The Gaussian beam becomes a plane wave if w0 tends to infinity and for this specific case, the expressions of the expansion coe cients reduce to those of a vector plane wave.
We next consider the general situation depicted in Fig. 1.7 and assume that the auxiliary coordinate system ObXbYbZb and the global coordinate system OXY Z have the same spatial orientation. The Gaussian beam propagates in a direction characterized by the zenith and azimuth angles βg and αg, respectively, while the polarization unit vector encloses the angle αpol with the xb-axis of the beam coordinate system Obxbybzb. As before, the particle coordinate system is obtained by rotating the global coordinate system through the Euler angles αp, βp and γp. The expansion of the Gaussian beam in the particle coordinate system is obtained by using the addition theorem for vector spherical wave functions under coordinate rotations (cf. (B.52) and (B.53)), and the result is
∞n
Ee(r) = amnM 1mn (ksr) + bmnN 1mn (ksr) ,
n=1 m=−n