ВУЗ: Не указан
Категория: Не указан
Дисциплина: Не указана
Добавлен: 19.10.2020
Просмотров: 2022
Скачиваний: 1
BRICS Long-Term Strategy
84
|
The law in Brazil seeks to define how to regulate urban property and urban policy
so as to guarantee the right to housing for all of its population. In 2005 Federal
Law no. 11.124 created the National System of Social Housing (
Sistema Nacional
de Habitação de Interesse Social
). In 2009 Brazil started implementing the national
social housing programme ‘My House, My Life’ (
Programa Minha Casa, Minha
Vida
– PMCMV). This programme has also become a flagship programme to
boost the labour market, reduce poverty and tackle socio-economic inequality.
The Russian housing system has gone through significant changes since market
liberalisation in the 1990s. In 2005 the Housing Code was introduced, which
aims to reduce the State’s commitment to the provision of social housing from
10 per cent to 5 per cent (Khmelnitskaya, 2012). There continues to be a large
backlog for housing. To address this, the new Housing Code aims to introduce the
following reforms: first, citizens who registered for social rental contracts before
1 March 2005 retain their right to social housing (Article 6, paragraph 2 HC).
Second, following that date the queue for social housing would be accessible only
to poor people, which would be determined on the basis of their income and the
property they own. In addition to these people, the following are also eligible for
social housing: orphans and children left without parents; victims of disaster and
emergency situations; those living in dilapidated houses subject to resettlement;
and those living in apartments occupied by several families.
Housing demand in India has been driven in large part by high rates
of urbanisation and internal labour migration (Government of India Ministry of
Housing & Urban Poverty Alleviation, 2007). The growth of the Indian workforce
has also had an impact on the rates of urbanisation in India. The cities present far
better opportunities for employment and an improved living standard. According
to the 2001 Indian Census, 61.8 million people (23.1 per cent of the urban
population) reside in slums; it is estimated that 55 per cent of the population of
Mumbai lives in slums. The quality of housing in slums is extremely poor. An
important reason for this is insecurity of tenure. Slums are also severely deficient
in basic services such as potable water, sanitation, sewerage, storm water drainage
and solid waste disposal.
Chinese housing policy has undergone significant reforms in the last two
decades. In particular, reform has taken place in the area of improving housing
affordability, allowing for greater ownership and increasing access within urban areas.
The current Chinese housing framework includes the Economical and Comfortable
Housing (ECH) programme, which aims to serve lower-middle and middle-income
urban families who may not be able to purchase market-rate housing. Low-cost
housing units are built by real estate developers for sale, not for rent, to eligible
families through market transactions.
Social Justice, Sustainable Development and Quality of Life
|
85
Over the past 20 years, 3.7 million houses and services sites were delivered in
South Africa, providing approximately 12.5 million people with access to shelter
and accommodation and a fixed asset. About 56 per cent of all subsidies were
allocated to female-headed households. The Constitution of the Republic of South
Africa guarantees everyone’s right of access to adequate housing. The State must
take reasonable legislative and other measures, within its available resources, to
progressively realise this right. Beyond the Constitution, since 1994 a raft of laws
has been promulgated relating to housing, which attests to the broad and complex
nature of the housing sector in the country. The 1994
White Paper on Housing
provided the framework for the country’s ambitious housing development target
of building 1 million state-funded houses in the first five years of office. It sets out
the underlying policy principles, as well as guidelines, norms and standards that
apply to all government housing programmes.
1.5 Climate change, ecological degradation and food insecurity
Restructuring of world economy towards new pattern constitutes one of the main
challenges to the future of development of BRICS countries. Considering the fact
that it is not an obstacle but rather a driver to growth, being generator of jobs, a
way to reducing poverty and improving quality of life, it is vital to create relevant
conditions for this pattern of development through environment-friendly industries
and investments. As emerging economies with large populations, land masses and
disparities among their people, BRICS countries stand to be significantly impacted
by climate change. The particular vulnerability of member states has thus required
them to actively participate in the negotiations and planning underway within
their regions and internationally. In the BRICS Fortaleza Declaration of 2014 all
member states committed to collectively address the challenges posed by climate
change and environmental degradation. In so doing they stated the following:
“Acknowledging that climate change is one of the greatest challenges facing
humankind, we call on all countries to build upon the decisions adopted in the
UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) with a view to
reaching a successful conclusion by 2015, of negotiations on the development of
a protocol, another legal instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force under
the Convention applicable to all Parties, in accordance with the principles and
provisions of UNFCCC, in particular the principle of common but differentiated
responsibilities and respective capabilities. In this regard, we reiterate our support
to the Presidency of the 20th session of the Conference of the Parties and the 10th
session of the Conference of the Parties serving as the Meeting of the Parties
to the Kyoto Protocol, to be held in Lima, Peru, in December 2014. We also
note the convening of the UN Climate Summit 2014 to be held this September”
(BRICS, 2014).
BRICS Long-Term Strategy
86
|
By virtue of the size and rate of growth of the economies of the BRICS
countries, their energy demands, their energy imports (for instance, in the case
of China and India) and their atmospheric emissions of various types, they make
essential partners in any regional or global discussions relating to climate change
or the production and consumption of energy.
The 2013 edition of the International Energy Agency’s report
CO
2
Emissions
from Fuel Combustion, Statistics Highlights
(see figure 4) portrays BRICS nations’
contribution to CO
2
emissions in the world. Although China is responsible
for more than 25 per cent of the world’s emissions, Russia and South Africa
had much higher per capita emissions in 2011, with values of 12.2 per cent
and 9 per cent, respectively. While China’s per capita share of emissions was
6.2 per cent, India had the lowest per capita share of CO
2
emissions with a
value of 1.7 per cent.
FIGURE 4
CO
2
emissions of BRICS countries as a percentage of the world’s CO
2
emissions (2001-2010)
(In %)
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Brazil
China
India
Russian Federation
South Africa
Source: International Energy Agency (2013). CO
2
Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2013, Statistics Highlights.
While bearing in mind that fossil fuel remains one of the major sources of
energy, BRICS reiterates the belief that renewable and clean energy, research and
development of new technologies and energy efficiency can be important drivers
to promote sustainable development, create new economic growth, reduce
energy costs and increase efficiency in the use of natural resources. Considering the
dynamic link between renewable and clean energy and sustainable development,
it is important to reaffirm the importance of continuing international efforts aimed
at promoting the deployment of renewable and clean energy and energy efficiency
technologies, taking into account national policies, priorities and resources.
Social Justice, Sustainable Development and Quality of Life
|
87
In India, China and South Africa there is a strong reliance on coal for generating
electricity. In 2011 about 93.7 per cent of South Africa’s electricity production
was from coal, compared to 78.9 per cent in China and 67.9 per cent in India.
India, meanwhile, has plans to expand its clean energy production, adding 20
gigawatts (GW) of solar energy capacity by 2022 and continuing to grow the wind
sector, already the fifth largest in the world. Russia’s electricity provision differs
from the other countries, with 49 per cent of its electricity generated from natural
gas, and an additional 16 per cent derived from nuclear sources.
Biodiversity is critical to ensuring environment sustainability. It is interconnected
with climate change and strongly affected by it (Convention on Biological
Diversity, 2015a). Continued biodiversity loss has a significant impact on the
BRICS nations, as they contain 8 of the world’s 34 biodiversity hotspots (Wu, 2011).
In addition to the loss of species, entire ecosystems are also in danger of collapsing.
Understanding the magnitude of the problem, BRICS is committed to the
implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity and its Protocols, with
special attention to the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 and the Aichi
Targets (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2015b). The Aichi Targets focus on:
• addressing the underlying causes of biodiversity loss by mainstreaming
biodiversity across government and society;
• reducing the direct pressures on biodiversity and promoting its sustainable use;
• improving the status of biodiversity by safeguarding ecosystems, species
and genetic diversity;
• enhancing the benefits from biodiversity and ecosystem services to all; and
• enhancing implementation through participatory planning, knowledge
management and capacity-building.
For each of these goals, individual targets have been set to assist in monitoring
how effectively the goals are being reached. In attempting to achieve these goals, China
has begun investing in reforestation, which has resulted in a 2.9 per cent annual gain
in forest coverage since 2000. Brazil has introduced additional legislation in an attempt
to curb deforestation, while Russia has hosted a Tiger Summit that was attended by 13
countries which pledged to double the population of wild tigers by 2020 (Wu, 2011).
The BRICS Ministers of Agriculture and Agrarian Development met in
Pretoria in 2013, following the Ethekwini Summit, to discuss the negative effects
of climate change on food security (DIRCO, 2013). The discussion focused on
the need to promote government interventions and participatory approaches for
a social-ecological economic development trajectory. Such interventions should
strengthen local economies and increase their resilience to exogenous shocks,
BRICS Long-Term Strategy
88
|
especially at the household level, where food, water and energy dependence is high.
It should also emphasise small-scale and sustainable livelihoods. This would mean
support in the form of policies and subsidies for improving local food production
in rural and urban areas through agro-ecological production, seed-saving and local
food markets, among other interventions.
Before the 2013 Ministers’ meetings, the first meeting of the BRICS
Agricultural Cooperation Working Group was held in Beijing, China, in August
2011. At this meeting, the Working Group agreed to establish an Action Plan on
Agricultural Cooperation of the BRICS countries for 2012-2016. The focus of the
Action Plan would be to ensure access to food for the most vulnerable.
Four of the five BRICS nations experience difficulties with respect to feeding
their people. Brazil has greatly reduced the proportion of undernourished citizens
from approximately 15 per cent to 6.9 per cent. About 10 per cent of the Indian
and Chinese populations are undernourished or food deprived; Brazil and South
Africa are a little better, since less than 10 per cent of their populations are
undernourished. Food security is a major concern for India and China. Due to
their very large populations (2.5 billion people in total), they must both dramatically
increase agricultural productivity and maintain reliable food suppliers abroad.
Food shortages can lead to social unrest. Learning from Brazilian knowledge about
agricultural productivity is, therefore, vital (Steunkel, 2013).
2 MAIN CHALLENGES
2.1 Social protection safety net programmes for all
Large proportions of BRICS populations are deprived of social protection due
to the continued existence and expansion of the informal sector. According to
the 2014 International Labour Organization report
Global Employment Trends
,
demographic challenges are likely to have the most influence on benefit provision
in the BRICS countries, since increasing life expectancy and a descending birth
rate mean countries will age rapidly (International Labour Organization, 2014).
Ensuring access to social protection services is a challenge for all the BRICS
members due to the physical size of the countries and their populations. Ensuring
universal access to social protection has required vast logistical operations for those
living in remote rural areas. Other challenges include banking facilities used as a
condition for accessing benefits. In India only 40 per cent of the population has a
bank account, while only 5 per cent of villages have access to a commercial bank
(Bank of India, n.d.). In the case of South Africa the distance and cost to travel to
major cities or towns to access services is a major constraint.