ВУЗ: Не указан
Категория: Не указан
Дисциплина: Не указана
Добавлен: 19.10.2020
Просмотров: 2012
Скачиваний: 1
Social Justice, Sustainable Development and Quality of Life
|
89
This is not to say that there are no successful experiences of cooperation and
sharing. The creation of the framework for BRICS cooperation on population matters
was successfully concluded at the 2014 BRICS Inaugural Seminar of Officials held
in South Africa (Partners in Population and Development and Experts on Population
Matters, 2014). The main objective of the inaugural seminar was to exchange
knowledge and experiences on each country’s population trends, dynamics and
policy responses. The framework, based on the ICPD Programme of Action,
agreed to collaboration through dialogue, cooperation, sharing of experiences and
capacity-building on population-related issues of mutual concern to member states
(Dlamini, 2014).
The document covers a wide range of issues including, “gender and women’s
rights; sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights; demographic
transition and post-transition challenges, including population structure change,
population ageing and mortality reduction/increasing life expectancy and social
integration of migrant farmers during rapid urbanization; information on population
and health, including data collection and utilization, and sharing information and
experience on improving the equity and quality of health of women and children”
(Department of Social Development, South Africa, n.d.).
The Fortaleza Declaration (July 2014, Brazil) reinforced BRICS commitment to
collaborating on issues of social protection and labour. This commitment was further
endorsed by the BRICS Trade Union Forum (2014), where member unions agreed
to:
“
1. Work on the basis of the standards and principles of the International Labour
Organization (ILO) to promote Decent Work, boost employment, secure a universal
social protection floor and promote the transition from the informal to the formal
economy; 2. Defend the legitimate rights of the working class within a progressive social
dimension; 3. Promote a development agenda that puts industrialization, environmental
justice and human progress for equitable and fair growth models at the center of our
common commitments; 4. Establish a dialogue and cooperation to promote peace,
security, human rights and global sustainable development; 5. Strengthen the social
protection for young people and women.”
2.2 Education
With regard to higher education, in India the challenge is particularly difficult due
to the need to widen access to institutions of higher education while ensuring that
such institutions are affordable (Indian Ministry of Human Resource Development,
2013). Russia is experiencing a decline in demand for tertiary education. To address
this decline in student enrolment, the country decided to merge or close some
tertiary institutions (Nikolaev and Chugunov, 2012; Russian Federation, 2014).
In South Africa the challenges experienced relate to high drop-out rates and low
graduation rates of previously disadvantaged population groups. This is attributed
to an inadequate level of preparedness of children leaving secondary school (HESA,
2009). In Brazil the primary challenge is to increase university enrolment.
BRICS Long-Term Strategy
90
|
The UNESCO Institute for Statistics database identifies the highest level of
education achieved by persons aged 25 years and older. The results of this survey
place the differences related to the socio-economic position of some of the BRICS
nations with available data in perspective (figure 5).
FIGURE 5
Population (aged 25+) by highest level of education
(In %)
9.5
4.0
0.6
12.0
14.2
43.0
8.9
13.6
15.1
6.6
7.0
6.7
5.2
5.4
7.0
21.9
28.1
5.5
5.7
11.5
3.6
60.1
6.4
27.9
13.5
16.5
47.2
0,00
20,00
40,00
60,00
80,00
100,00
120,00
Brazil 2011
China 2010
Russian Federation 2010 South Africa 2012
%
Incomplete primary (%)
Lower secondary (ISCED 2) (%)
No schooling (%)
Post-secondary non-tertiary (ISCED 4) (%)
Primary (ISCED 1) (%)
Tertiary (ISCED 5-6) (%)
Upper secondary (ISCED 3) (%)
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
Student repetition and high drop-out rates are worrying trends that hinder
efforts to achieve universal primary education. MDG 2.2 identifies the proportion
of pupils who start grade 1 and actually reach the last grade of primary school.
This indicator is calculated using enrolment and repetition data for two consecutive
years. Based on this method, India is found to perform poorly, as data collected
in 2001 highlight a 61.4 per cent retention rate.
TABLE 10
Percentage of pupils starting grade 1 who reach last grade of primary education
Country
Latest year of data
Both sexes
Boys
Girls
Parity index
Brazil
2005
88.7
-
-
-
China
2014
92.6
-
-
-
India
2001
61.4
59.7
63.5
1.1
Russian Federation
2011
96.6
89.8
92.6
1.0
South Africa
2003
77.0
75.0
79.1
1.1
Sources: United Nations Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Millennium Development Goals (2014). Indicators and Millennium
Development Goal Indicators Database.
Social Justice, Sustainable Development and Quality of Life
|
91
The difference in interpretation of the definition of primary education may
explain the low values of primary schooling suggested by the UNESCO data.
In Brazil in 2011 approximately 45 per cent of the population above the age of 25
had either completed primary education, had started but not completed primary
school or had not gone to school at all. Around 39 per cent of the population had
either completed upper secondary schooling (27.9 per cent) or some form of tertiary
education (11.4 per cent). In the Russian Federation in 2010, approximately
82 per cent of the population had completed either upper secondary schooling
(16.5 per cent), a post-secondary but non-tertiary education (5.4 per cent) or
some form of tertiary education (60.1 per cent).
In China in 2010, approximately 38 per cent of the population had either
completed primary schooling, had started but not completed primary school or had
not gone to school at all. About 22 per cent of the population had either completed
upper secondary schooling (13.5 per cent), a post-secondary but non-tertiary
education (5.2 per cent) or some form of tertiary education (3.6 per cent).
(UN Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Millennium Development Goals, 2014)
In 2012 in South Africa approximately 24 per cent of the population had
either completed primary schooling, had started but not completed primary
school, or had not gone to school at all. Around 47 per cent of the population
had completed upper secondary school, but only an additional 13 per cent had
completed tertiary education or a post-secondary/non-tertiary level of schooling.
This indicator may provide a clue for understanding the difficulties experienced
in accessing higher education in the BRICS countries.
Furthermore, BRICS members are encountering a large-scale, long-term
brain drain – through educational emigration and the direct outflow of qualified
professionals – leading to a significant loss of both highly qualified professionals
and financial losses derived from the expenses incurred on their education in
their home countries. Simultaneously, India and China have developed policies
and actively worked on both upholding ties with their elite diasporas abroad and
bringing some of them back home.
2.3 Health
Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) account for 63 per cent of all global deaths
and 80 per cent of deaths in low- and middle-income countries (WHO, 2010).
BRICS Health Ministers have tasked a group to focus on NCDs. Table 11 presents
premature mortality (death before age 70) due to NCDs and associated age-adjusted
mortality rates in BRICS countries in 2008. Russians are comparatively more predisposed
to die before the age of 70 due to NCDs than other BRICS residents, whilst Brazilians
are less likely to die from NCDs.
BRICS Long-Term Strategy
92
|
TABLE 11
Non-communicable diseases deaths before age 70 (%) and age-adjusted death rates,
BRICS, 2008
Country
Males (%)
Females (%)
Age-adjusted death rates
Data year
Brazil
52.3
42.2
614.0
2008
Russia
55.0
25.4
1108.6
2007
India
61.8
55.0
781.7
2003
China
43.9
32.0
665.2
2006
South Africa
69.0
53.7
733.7
2007
Source: World Health Organization (2011). Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. Geneva, WHO.
There are major gender disparities in premature mortality, as males are more likely
than females to die from NCDs. The gender disparities are wide (a 30 percentage point
difference) in the Russian Federation, followed by South Africa with a 15 percentage
point difference, China (12 percentage points), Brazil (10) and India with the least
disparity at 7 percentage points (BRICS, 2013a).
BRICS countries have committed to introduce policies and programmes
that aim to reduce the risk factors such as tobacco use, unhealthy diets, physical
inactivity, obesity and harmful alcohol consumption that are associated with
cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and cancer. In this regard all five BRICS countries
have signed, ratified or endorsed the 2012 WHO Framework Convention on
Tobacco Control (FCTC), thus committing to cooperation to introduce policies
to counter the impact of tobacco advertising and labelling and sales of tobacco
products (WHO, 2008). However, with respect to implementation of the FCTC,
BRICS countries have not all met the deadlines with respect to compliance with
packaging requirements (Article 11) or a ban on advertising domestically and in
cross-border areas (Article 13) (WHO, 2012).
Levels of physical activity for maintaining a healthy lifestyle show marked
differences among BRICS countries. Based on the WHO estimates, Brazil and
South Africa appear to have higher rates of physical inactivity among males
and females aged 15 years or older compared to the other three BRICS countries.
Unhealthy diets, involving higher consumption of fats and salt and lower
consumption of fruits and vegetables, are related to several outcomes: hypertension,
a risk factor for heart diseases, is associated with high consumption of salt;
obesity, a risk factor for diabetes, is associated with high consumption of saturated
fats and trans-fats; and inadequate consumption of vegetables and fruits is
associated with cardiovascular diseases, stomach and colorectal cancer (WHO, 2011).
Currently, data are not collected uniformly across BRICS countries on this
indicator of unhealthy diets.
Social Justice, Sustainable Development and Quality of Life
|
93
Food fortification is the addition of vitamins and minerals to foods while
they are being processed (WHO, 2006). A well-designed fortification programme
includes foods that are commonly consumed and does not rely on the population
eating more of any specific food. In August 2014, 80 countries mandated the
fortification of wheat flour, 12 mandated the fortification of maize flour, and 5
mandated the fortification of rice (FFI, 2014a). All BRICS countries have policies
supporting food fortification. Both Brazil (Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária,
2002) and South Africa (R504, 2013) have legislation that mandates fortification
of wheat flour and maize flour. The former Soviet Union used to fortify wheat flour
(Tazhibayev, 2008). The Russian Federation (Jackson, 2002), India (Rah, 2013),
China (Zhao, 2004) and South Africa fortified salt for human consumption with
iodine in 1995 (Jooste, Weight & Lombard, 2001). Lessons can be learned from
the Brazilian and South African experiences with fortification that can be extended
to Russia, India and China.
Harmful alcohol consumption is associated with NCDs – specifically, cancers,
cardiovascular diseases and liver cirrhosis. In view of the absence of good and
comparable data, WHO projected estimates of adult per capita consumption of
pure alcohol and identified that China and India have a much lower estimated
rate of consumption of pure alcohol (2.6 per cent and 5.5 per cent, respectively)
than South Africa, Brazil and the Russian Federation (10.6 per cent, 10.8 per cent
and 16.2 per cent, respectively) (WHO, 2010).
HIV/AIDS is a major public health and social problem in BRICS countries,
requiring them to share experiences and coordinate approaches, especially since
there is increasing movement of people between them. Although BRICS countries
differ significantly in the magnitude of the problem, each one of them has a sizeable
population living with HIV (see table 12). Among the BRICS countries, South
Africa has the largest number of people living with HIV.
TABLE 12
Magnitude of HIV/AIDS pandemic in BRICS countries for adults 15-49 years (2012)
Country
HIV prevalence (%)
People living with HIV
Brazil
0.5
490,000
Russia
1.1
1,300,000
India
0.3
2,088,642
China
1
0.1
780,000
South Africa
12.2
6,400,000
Total
2.8
11,058,000
Source: WHO (2013).
Note:
1
2011.