ВУЗ: Не указан

Категория: Не указан

Дисциплина: Не указана

Добавлен: 07.04.2021

Просмотров: 573

Скачиваний: 1

ВНИМАНИЕ! Если данный файл нарушает Ваши авторские права, то обязательно сообщите нам.
background image

24

H

O

W T

H

E EU

R

O

P

E

A

N

 U

N

IO

N W

O

R

K

S

T

H

E E

U

R

O

P

E

A

N

 C

O

M

M

IS

S

IO

N

: P

R

O

M

O

T

IN

G T

H

E C

O

M

M

O

N

 I

N

T

E

R

E

S

T

3.  Enforcing European law

The Commission acts as ‘guardian of the 
Treaties’. This means that the Commission, 
together with the Court of Justice, is responsi-
ble for making sure EU law is properly applied 
in all the member states.

If it fi nds that an EU country is not applying 
an EU law, it launches a process called the 
‘infringement procedure’. The fi rst step is to 
send the government an offi cial letter, saying 
why the Commission considers this country 
is infringing EU law and setting it a deadline 
for sending a detailed explanation.

If the member state does not have a satisfac-
tory explanation or put matters right, the Com-
mission will send another letter confi rming 
that EU law has been infringed and setting a 
deadline for it to be corrected. If the member 
state still fails to comply, the Commission 
will refer the matter to the Court of Justice to 
decide. The Court’s judgements are binding 
on the member states and the EU institutions. 
In cases where member states continue 
failing to adhere to a judgment, the Court 
can impose fi nancial sanctions.

4.   Representing the EU on the

international stage

The European Commission is an important 
spokesperson for the European Union on the 
international stage. It is the voice of the EU in 
international forums such as the World Trade 
Organisation, in negotiations on the inter-
national climate change agreement, the 
Kyoto Protocol, and the EU’s important aid 
and trade partnership with developing 
countries in Africa, the Caribbean and the 
Pacifi c, known as the Cotonou Agreement. 

The Commission also speaks and negotiates 
on behalf of the EU in areas where the mem-
ber states have pooled sovereignty. This is 
done on the basis of agreements reached in 
advance with the member states. 

How is the Commission’s work 
organised?

It is up to the Commission President to de-
cide which commissioner will be responsible 
for which policy area, and to reshuffl e these 
responsibilities (if necessary) during the 
Commission’s term of offi ce.

The Commission generally meets once a 
week, usually on Wednesdays, and usually 
in Brussels. Each item on the agenda is pre-
sented by the commissioner responsible for 
that policy area, and the whole team then 
takes a collective decision on it.

The Commission’s staff is organised in de-
partments, known as ‘directorates-general’ 
(DGs) and ‘services’ (such as the Legal Serv-
ice). Each DG is responsible for a particular 
policy area and is headed by a director-general 
who is answerable to one of the commission-
ers. Overall coordination is provided by the 
Secretariat-General, which also manages the 
weekly Commission meetings. It is headed 
by the Secretary General, who is answerable 
directly to the President.

It is the DGs that actually devise and draft 
legislative proposals, but these proposals 
become offi cial only when ‘adopted’ by 
the Commission at its weekly meeting. The 
procedure is roughly as follows.

Suppose, for example, that the Commission 
sees a need for EU legislation to prevent 
pollution of Europe’s rivers. The Directorate-
General for the Environment will draw up a 
proposal, based on extensive consultations 
with European industry, farming and envir-
onmental organisations, and environment 
ministries in the EU countries. The draft will 
also be discussed with other Commission 
departments with an interest in this topic, 
and checked by the Legal Service and the 
Secretariat-General.

How the EU works_V5.indd   Sec6:24

How the EU works_V5.indd   Sec6:24

5/11/07   14:49:31

5/11/07   14:49:31


background image

H

O

W T

H

E EU

R

O

P

E

A

N

 U

N

IO

N W

O

R

K

S

T

H

E E

U

R

O

P

E

A

N

 C

O

M

M

IS

S

IO

N

: P

R

O

M

O

T

IN

G T

H

E C

O

M

M

O

N

 I

N

T

E

R

E

S

T

25

Once the proposal is fully ready, it will be put 
on the agenda of a Commission meeting. If 
at least 14 of the 27 commissioners approve 
the proposal, the Commission will adopt it and 
it will have the whole team’s unconditional 
support. The document will then be sent to 

the Council and the European Parliament for 
them to decide on the proposal. The Commis-
sion may subsequently make amendments 
in the light of the comments from these two 
institutions and then send the proposal back 
for fi nal approval.

European Commission President José Manuel Barroso sees for himself the dramatic effects 
climate change is already having on Greenland.

© EC

How the EU works_V5.indd   Sec6:25

How the EU works_V5.indd   Sec6:25

5/11/07   14:49:31

5/11/07   14:49:31


background image

The Court of Justice of the European Commu-
nities (often referred to simply as ‘the Court’) 
dates back to the very fi rst of the EU Trea-
ties, the ECSC Treaty of 1952. It is based in 
Luxembourg.

Its job is to make sure that EU legislation is in-
terpreted and applied in the same way in all EU 
countries, so that the law is equal for everyone. 
It ensures, for example, that national courts do 
not give different rulings on the same issue.

The Court also makes sure that EU mem-
ber states and institutions do what the law 
requires. The Court has the power to settle 
legal disputes between EU member states, EU 
institutions, businesses and individuals.

The Court is composed of one judge per mem-
ber state, so that all 27 of the EU’s national 
legal systems are represented. For the sake 
of effi ciency, however, the Court rarely sits as 
the full court. It usually sits as a ‘Grand Cham-
ber’ of just 13 judges or in chambers of fi ve or 
three judges.

The Court is assisted by eight ‘advocates-
general’. Their role is to present opinions on 
the cases brought before the Court. They 
must do so publicly and impartially.

The judges and advocates-general are people 
whose impartiality is beyond doubt. They have 
the qualifi cations or competence needed for 
appointment to the highest judicial positions 
in their home countries. They are appointed 
to the Court of Justice by joint agreement 
between the governments of the EU member 
states. Each is appointed for a term of six 
years, which may be renewed.

To help the Court of Justice cope with the 
large number of cases brought before it, and 
to offer citizens better legal protection, a 
Court of First Instance was created in 1988. 
This court (which is attached to the Court 
of Justice) is responsible for giving rulings 
on certain kinds of case, particularly actions 
brought by private individuals, companies 
and some organisations, and cases relating 

26

H

O

W T

H

E EU

R

O

P

E

A

N

 U

N

IO

N W

O

R

K

S

T

H

E

 C

O

U

R

T

 O

F

 J

U

S

T

IC

E

: U

P

H

O

L

D

IN

G

 T

H

E

 L

A

W

           

ROLE //

 

To give legal judgments on cases brought before it

COURT OF JUSTICE //

 

One judge from each EU country; eight advocates-general

COURT OF FIRST 
INSTANCE //

 

At least one judge from each EU country (27 in 2007)

CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL //

 Seven judges

TERM OF OFFICE //

 

Renewable terms of six years

ADDRESS //

 

Boulevard Konrad Adenauer, L-2925 Luxembourg

TEL. //

 

(352) 43 03-1

INTERNET //

 curia.europa.eu

The Court of Justice: 

upholding the law

KEY FACTS

 

How the EU works_V5.indd   Sec16:26

How the EU works_V5.indd   Sec16:26

5/11/07   14:49:32

5/11/07   14:49:32


background image

H

O

W T

H

E EU

R

O

P

E

A

N

 U

N

IO

N W

O

R

K

S

T

H

E C

O

U

R

T O

F

 J

U

S

T

IC

E

: U

P

H

O

L

D

IN

G T

H

E L

A

W

to competition law. This court also has one 
judge from each EU country.

The European Union Civil Service Tribunal 
adjudicates in disputes between the Euro-
pean Union and its civil service. This tribunal 
is composed of seven judges and is attached 
to the Court of First Instance. 

The Court of Justice, the Court of First Instance 
and the Civil Service Tribunal each have a presi-
dent chosen by their fellow judges to serve 
for a renewable term of three years. Vassilios 
Skouris was elected President of the Court of 
Justice in 2003. Marc Jaeger was appointed 
President of the Court of First Instance in 2007. 
Paul J. Mahoney has been President of the Civil 
Service Tribunal since 2005.

What does the Court do?

The Court gives rulings on cases brought 
before it. The fi ve most common types of 
case are:

1.  references for a preliminary ruling;

2. actions for failure to fulfi l an obligation;

3. actions for annulment;

4. actions for failure to act;

5. actions for damages.

They are each described in greater detail 
below.

1.   The preliminary ruling procedure

The national courts in each EU country are re-
sponsible for ensuring that EU law is properly 
applied in that country. But there is a risk that 
courts in different countries might interpret 
EU law in different ways.

To prevent this happening, there is a ‘pre-
liminary ruling procedure’. This means that 
if a national court is in any doubt about the 
interpretation or validity of an EU law it may, 
and sometimes must, ask the Court of Justice 
for advice. This advice is given in the form of 
a ‘preliminary ruling’.

27

27

Air hostesses have benefited several times from European Court of Justice rulings on equal pay and equal rights.

© Alam

y/Imageselect

How the EU works_V5.indd   Sec7:27

How the EU works_V5.indd   Sec7:27

5/11/07   14:49:33

5/11/07   14:49:33


background image

28

H

O

W T

H

E EU

R

O

P

E

A

N

 U

N

IO

N W

O

R

K

S

T

H

E C

O

U

R

T O

F

 J

U

S

T

IC

E

: U

P

H

O

L

D

IN

G T

H

E L

A

W

2.   Actions for failure to fulfi l an 

obligation

The Commission can start these proceedings 
if it has reason to believe that a member state 
is failing to fulfi l its obligations under EU law. 
These proceedings may also be started by 
another EU country.

In either case, the Court investigates the 
allegations and gives its judgment. The ac-
cused member state, if it is indeed found to 
be at fault, must set things right at once. If 
the Court fi nds that the member state has not 
complied with its judgment, it may impose a 
fi ne on that country.

3.  Actions for annulment

If any of the member states, the Council, the 
Commission or (under certain conditions) Par-
liament believes that a particular EU law is 
illegal, they may ask the Court to annul it.

These ‘actions for annulment’ can also be used 
by private individuals who want the Court to 
cancel a particular law because it directly and 
adversely affects them as individuals.

If the Court fi nds that the law in question was 
not correctly adopted or is not correctly based 
on the Treaties, it may declare the law null 
and void.

4.  Actions for failure to act

The Treaty requires the European Parliament, 
the Council and the Commission to make cer-
tain decisions under certain circumstances. 
If they fail to do so, the member states, the 
other EU institutions and (under certain con-
ditions) individuals or companies can lodge a 
complaint with the Court so as to have this 
failure to act offi cially recorded.

5.  Actions for damages

Any person or company who has suffered 
damage as a result of the action or inaction 
of the Community or its staff may bring an 
action seeking compensation before the 
Court of First Instance.

How is the Court’s work 
organised?

Cases are submitted to the registry and a 
specifi c judge and advocate-general are 
assigned to each case.

The procedure that follows is in two stages: 
fi rst a written and then an oral phase.

At the fi rst stage, all the parties involved sub-
mit written statements and the judge assigned 
to the case draws up a report summarising 
these statements and the legal background 
to the case.

Then comes the second stage — the public 
hearing. Depending on the importance and 
complexity of the case, this hearing can take 
place before a chamber of three, fi ve or 13 
judges, or before the full Court. At the hear-
ing, the parties’ lawyers put their case before 
the judges and the advocate-general, who 
can question them. The advocate-general 
then gives his or her opinion, after which the 
judges deliberate and deliver their judgment. 
This will not necessarily follow the opinion of 
the advocate-general.

Judgments of the Court are decided by a 
majority and pronounced at a public hearing. 
Dissenting opinions are not expressed. Deci-
sions are published on the day of delivery.

The procedure in the Court of First Instance 
is similar, except that there is no opinion from 
an advocate-general.

How the EU works_V5.indd   Sec7:28

How the EU works_V5.indd   Sec7:28

5/11/07   14:49:34

5/11/07   14:49:34