Файл: Ersoy O.K. Diffraction, Fourier optics, and imaging (Wiley, 2006)(ISBN 0471238163)(427s) PEo .pdf
ВУЗ: Не указан
Категория: Не указан
Дисциплина: Не указана
Добавлен: 28.06.2024
Просмотров: 938
Скачиваний: 0
142 FOURIER TRANSFORMS AND IMAGING WITH COHERENT OPTICAL SYSTEMS
impulse response. This smoothing operation can strongly attenuate the fine details of the image.
In a more general imaging system with many lenses, Eqs. (9.4-17) and (9.4-18) remain valid provided that P(.,.) denotes the finite equivalent exit pupil of the system, and the system is diffraction limited [Goodman]. An optical system is diffraction limited if a diverging spherical wave incident on the entrance pupil is mapped into a converging spherical wave at the exit pupil.
9.5PHASE CONTRAST MICROSCOPY
In this and the next section, the theory discussed in the previous sections is illustrated with two advanced imaging techniques. Phase contrast microscopy is a technique to generate high contrast images of transparent objects, such as living cells in cultures, thin tissue slices, microorganisms, lithographic patterns, fibers and the like. This is achieved by converting small phase changes in to amplitude changes, which can then be viewed in high contrast. In this process, the specimen being viewed is not negatively perturbed.
The image of an industrial phase contrast microscope is shown in Figure 9.6. When light passes through a transparent object, its phase is modified at each
point. Hence, the transmission function of the specimen with coherent illumination can be written as
tðx; yÞ ¼ e jðy0þyðx;yÞÞ |
ð9:5-1Þ |
where y0 is the average phase, and the phase shift yðx; yÞ is considerably less than
Figure 9.6. The schematic of an industrial phase contrast microscope [Nikon].
PHASE CONTRAST MICROSCOPY |
143 |
2p. Hence, tðx; yÞ can be approximated as |
|
tðx; yÞ ¼ e jy0 ½1 þ jyðx; yÞ& |
ð9:5-2Þ |
where the last factor is the first two terms of the Taylor series expansion of e jyðx;yÞ.
A microscope is sensitive to the intensity of light that can be written as |
|
Iðx; yÞ ¼ j1 þ jyðx; yÞj2 1 |
ð9:5-3Þ |
Hence, no image is observable. We note that Eq. (9.5-3) is true because the first term of unity due to undiffracted light is in phase quadrature with jyðx; yÞ generated by the diffracted light. In order to circumvent this problem, a phase plate yielding p=2 or 3p=2 phase shift with the undiffracted light can be used. This is usually achieved by using a glass substrate with a transparent dielectric dot giving p=2 or 3p=2 phase shift, typically by controlling thickness at the focal point of the imaging system. The undiffracted light passes through the focal point whereas the diffracted light from the specimen is spread away from the focal point since it has high spatial frequencies. On the imaging plane, the intensity can now be written as
Iðx; yÞ ¼ ejp=2 þ jyðx; yÞ 2 1 þ 2yðx; yÞ |
ð9:5-4Þ |
with p=2 phase shift, and |
|
Iðx; yÞ ¼ ej3p=2 þ jyðx; yÞ 2 1 2yðx; yÞ |
ð9:5-5Þ |
with 3p=2 phase shift. Equations (9.5-4) and (9.5-5) are referred to as positive and negative phase contrast, respectively. In either case, the phase variation yðx; yÞ is observable as an image since it is converted into intensity. An example of imaging with phase contrast microscope in comparison to a regular microscope is shown in Figure 9.7.
Figure 9.7. (a) Image of a specimen with a regular microscope, (b) image of the same specimen with a phase contrast microscope [Nikon].
144 FOURIER TRANSFORMS AND IMAGING WITH COHERENT OPTICAL SYSTEMS
It is possible to further improve the method by designing more complex phase plates. For example, contrast can be modulated by varying the properties of the phase plate such as absorption, refractive index, and thickness. Apodized phase contrast objectives have also been utilized.
9.6SCANNING CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY
The conventional microscope is a device which images the entire object field simultaneously. In scanning microscopy, an image of only one object point is generated at a time. This requires scanning the object to generate an image of the entire field. A diagram of a reflection mode scanning optical microscope is shown in Figure 9.8. Such a system can also be operated in the transmission mode. Modern systems feed the image information to a computer system which allows digital postprocessing and image processing.
In scanning confocal microscopy, light from a point source probes a very small area of the object, and another point detector ensures that only light from the same object area is detected. A particular configuration of a scanning confocal microscope is shown in Figure 9.8 [Wilson, 1990]. In this system, the image is generated by scanning both the source and the detector in synchronism. Another configuration is shown in Figure 9.9. In this mode, the confocal microscope has excellent depth discrimination property (Figure 9.10). Using this property, parallel sections of a thick translucent object can be imaged with high resolution.
9.6.1Image Formation
Equation (9.4-16) can be written as
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Uðx0; y0Þ ¼ |
ð ð |
h x1 þ |
x0 |
; y1 |
þ |
y0 |
Uðx1; y1Þdx1dy1 |
ð9:6-1Þ |
|
M |
M |
where d0 and d1 are dropped from the input output complex amplitudes, to be understood from the context. The impulse response function given by Eq. (9.4-18)
X-Y
Laser
Scanning
Object
|
|
|
|
Detector |
|
Display |
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 9.8. Schematic diagram of a reflection mode scanning confocal microscope.
SCANNING CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY |
145 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 9.9. A confocal optical microscope system.
can be written as
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
hðx; yÞ ¼ |
ð |
ð |
Pðld0x1; ld0y1Þe 2pjðx1xþy1yÞdx1dy1 |
ð9:6-2Þ |
|
1 1 |
|
|
where Pðx1; y1Þ is the pupil function of the lens system.
In confocal microscopy, since one object point is imaged at a time, Uðx1; y1Þ can be written as
Uðx1; y1Þ ¼ dðx1Þdyðx1Þ |
ð9:6-3Þ |
Hence,
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uðx0; y0Þ ¼ |
ð ð |
h x1 þ |
x0 |
; y1 |
þ |
y0 |
dðx1Þdyðx1Þdx1dy1 |
|
|
||
M |
M |
|
|
Þ |
|||||||
|
1 1 |
|
|
|
|
ð |
9:6-4 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¼ h x0 ; y0 M M
The intensity of the point image becomes
Iðx0; y0Þ ¼ |
h M |
; M |
ð9:6-5Þ |
|||
|
|
x0 |
|
y0 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming a circularly symmetric pupil function of radius a, Pðx1; y1Þ can be written as
x |
1; |
y |
1Þ ¼ |
P |
ðrÞ ¼ |
1 r 1=2 |
9 |
: |
6-6 |
Þ |
ð |
|
|
0 otherwise |
ð |
|
146 FOURIER TRANSFORMS AND IMAGING WITH COHERENT OPTICAL SYSTEMS
where
|
¼ p |
ð |
|
Þ |
|
r |
|
x12 þ y12 |
|
9:6-7 |
|
|
2a |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
PðrÞ is the cylinder function studied in Example 2.6. The impulse response function becomes the Hankel transform of PðrÞ, and is given by
|
|
|
|
|
p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hðx0; y0Þ ¼ hðr0Þ ¼ |
|
sombðr0Þ |
|
ð9:6-8Þ |
||||||||
4 |
|
|||||||||||
where |
|
|
|
q |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
r0 ¼ x02 þ y02 |
|
|
|
ð9:6-9Þ |
||||||
somb r |
0Þ ¼ |
2J1ðpr0Þ |
|
|
|
ð |
9:6-10 |
Þ |
||||
pr0 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
ð |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
The intensity of the point image becomes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
MJ1 pr0=M |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
ð |
Þ |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Iðx0; y0 |
Þ ¼ |
|
2r0 |
|
|
|
ð9:6-11Þ |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In practice, there are typically two lenses used, as seen in Figure 9.9. They are called objective and collector lenses. Suppose that the two lenses have impulse response functions h1 and h2, respectively. By repeated application of Eq. (9.7-1), it can be shown that the image intensity can be written as
Iðx0; y0Þ ¼ jht Uðx1; y1Þj2 |
ð9:6-12Þ |
where |
|
ht ¼ h1h2 |
ð9:6-13Þ |
If the lenses are equal, with impulse response h given by Eq. (9.7-7), the output intensity can be written as
|
|
MJ1 |
pr0 |
=M |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
ð |
|
Þ |
|
|
Iðx0; y0Þ ¼ |
|
|
2r0 |
|
|
|
ð9:6-14Þ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXAMPLE 9.1 Determine the transfer function of the two-lens scanning confocal microscope.
Solution: Since ht ¼ h1h2, we have
Htðfx; fyÞ ¼ H1ðfx; fyÞ H2ðfx; fyÞ
OPERATOR ALGEBRA FOR COMPLEX OPTICAL SYSTEMS |
147 |
where, for two equal lenses,
H1ðfx; fyÞ ¼ H2ðfx; fyÞ ¼ Pðld0x1; ld0y1Þ
If the pupil function P is circularly symmetric, Htðfx; fyÞ is also symmetric, and can be written as
Htðfx; fyÞ ¼ HtðrÞ
where
q r ¼ fx2 þ fy2
Hence,
HtðrÞ ¼ H1ðrÞ H2ðrÞ
It can be shown that this convolution is given by |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
"cos 1 |
|
|
|
|
r |
# |
|||||
|
2 |
|
r |
|
r |
|
2 |
||||||
|
r |
|
|
|
|||||||||
HtðrÞ ¼ |
p |
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
where
(
1 0 r 1
PðrÞ ¼
0otherwise
9.7OPERATOR ALGEBRA FOR COMPLEX OPTICAL SYSTEMS
The results derived in Sections 9.1–9.5 can be combined together in an operator algebra to analyze complex optical systems with coherent illumination [Goodman]. For simple results to be obtained, it is necessary to assume that the results are valid within the paraxial approximations involved in Fresnel diffraction and geometrical optics.
An operator algebra is discussed below in which the apertures are assumed to be separable in rectangular coordinates so that 2-D systems are discussed in terms of 1-D systems.
The operators involve fundamental operations that occur within a complex optical system. If U(x) is the current field, OðuÞ½U1ðxÞ& will denote the transformation