Файл: Ufimtsev P. Fundamentals of the physical theory of diffraction (Wiley 2007)(348s) PEo .pdf

ВУЗ: Не указан

Категория: Не указан

Дисциплина: Не указана

Добавлен: 28.06.2024

Просмотров: 983

Скачиваний: 0

ВНИМАНИЕ! Если данный файл нарушает Ваши авторские права, то обязательно сообщите нам.

176 Chapter 7 Elementary Acoustic and Electromagnetic Edge Waves

Figure 7.4 Local Cartesian coordinates (x1, y1, z1) with axes x1 and z1 placed in wedge face 1 (ϕ = 0), where the axis y1 is normal to this face (yˆ1 = nˆ). Similar Cartesian coordinates (x2, y2, z2) are also introduced with axes x2 and z2 in face 2 (ϕ = α), and with yˆ2 = nˆ .

(

r2 = (x2 ξ2)2 + h22 determine the distances between the observation and integration points (Fig. 7.4).

For the Green function of the free space, we use Equation (6.616-3) in Gradshteyn and Ryzhik (1994):

 

 

 

eikr1,2

 

i

(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

=

 

eip(x1,2ξ1,2)H0

 

(qh1,2)dp,

(7.21)

 

 

 

 

 

r1,2

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

−∞

 

 

 

 

 

 

'

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

y1,22 + z1,22

 

where q =

k2

p2, with Im(q) ≥ 0, and h1,2

=

≥ 0. The square root

q is a two-valued function. In order to make it a

single-valued function we introduce

(

 

 

 

 

two branch cuts (−∞ ≤ Re( p) ≤ −k and k ≤ Re( p) ≤ ∞) in the complex plane ( p). The integration contour in Equation (7.21) is located on the upper side of the left cut and skirts over the branch point p = −k, then it follows along the real axis to the right cut and skirts under the branch point p = k. After that, the integration contour follows along the lower side of the right cut.

The normal derivatives of the Green function are defined by

 

eikr1,2

 

 

eikr1,2

y

 

eikr1,2

 

y

 

 

eikr1,2

∂n

 

r1,2

=

 

r1,2

 

· ˆ1,2 = −

r1,2

·

ˆ1,2

= −

∂y1,2

 

r1,2

 

 

 

 

 

iy1,2

 

(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

=

 

 

 

 

eip(x1,2ξ1,2)qH1

 

(qh1,2)dp.

(7.22)

 

 

 

2h1,2

−∞

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note that the differential operator ( ) performs the differentiation with respect to the coordinates of the integration (observation) point. The quantities y1,2 are expressed in terms of the spherical coordinates (R, ϑ , ϕ) as

y1 = R sin ϑ sin ϕ

and

y2 = R sin ϑ sinϕ),

(7.23)

and the quantities h1,2 are determined in terms of the coordinates (R, β1, β2) as

h1 = R sin β1

and

h2 = R sin β2.

(7.24)

TEAM LinG


7.3 Triple Integrals for Elementary Edge Waves 177

After substituting the sources js,h(1) and the above expressions into the field formulas (7.19) and (7.20), one obtains

 

du1(1) = u0eikζ cos γ0 dζ

k sin2 γ

0

Iu(x1, h1, ϕ0)

(7.25)

 

16π α

 

and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

= u0eikζ cos γ0 dζ

i

 

sin γ0 sin ϑ sin ϕ

 

dv1

 

 

 

 

 

 

Iv (x1, h1, ϕ0)

(7.26)

16π α

 

 

sin β1

 

 

with

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Iu(x1, h1, ϕ0) =

eikξ1 cos2 γ0 dξ1

 

eip(x1ξ1)H0(1)(qh1)dp

 

 

 

0

 

−∞

 

 

 

 

 

×eikξ1 sin2 γ0 cos η [w1+ ϕ0) w1ϕ0)] sin η dη,

D

Iv (x1, h1, ϕ0) =

eikξ1 cos2 γ0 dξ1

eip(x1ξ1)qH1(1)(qh1)dp

 

0

−∞

×eikξ1 sin2 γ0 cos η [w1+ ϕ0) + w1ϕ0)]dη

D

and

du2(1) = u0eikζ cos γ0 dζ

k sin2 γ

0

Iu(x2, h2, α ϕ0),

16π α

 

(7.27)

(7.28)

(7.29)

dv(1)

=

u

0

eikζ cos γ0

dζ

i

 

sin γ0 sin ϑ sinϕ)

I

v

(x

2

, h

2

, α

ϕ

0

). (7.30)

16π α

 

2

 

 

 

 

sin β2

 

 

 

 

 

It may be seen that Equations (7.29) and (7.30) for the fields generated by strip 2 can be obtained from Equations (7.25) and (7.26) for the fields from strip 1 by the formal replacements

x1 −→ x2, h1 −→ h2, β1 −→ β2 · ϕ0 −→ α ϕ0, ϕ −→ α ϕ. (7.31)

For this reason, further calculations are carried out only for the fields du1(1), dv1(1), and the final expressions for the fields du2(1), dv2(1) will be obtained using the relationships (7.31).

The next section deals with the analytical work on the integrals Iu and Iv .

TEAM LinG


178 Chapter 7 Elementary Acoustic and Electromagnetic Edge Waves

7.4 TRANSFORMATION OF TRIPLE INTEGRALS INTO ONE-DIMENSIONAL INTEGRALS

First, we change in Equations (7.27) and (7.28) the order of integration:

Iu =

 

eipx1 H0(1)(qh1) dp

[w−1+ ϕ0) w−1ϕ0)] sin η dη

 

 

−∞

 

D

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

×

0

e1( p2

+k2 cos η) dξ1,

(7.32)

Iv =

 

eipx1 qH1(1)(qh1) dp [w−1+ ϕ0) + w−1ϕ0)]dη

 

 

−∞

 

 

D

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

×

0

e1( p2

+k2 cos η) dξ1,

(7.33)

where

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

p2 = p k cos2 γ0

and k2 = k sin2 γ0.

(7.34)

The integral over the variable ξ is calculated under the condition Im( p2 + k2 cos η) < 0 to ensure its convergence. Then,

I

1

 

 

eipx1 H

(1)

(qh

) dp

[w−1+ ϕ0) w−1ϕ0)] sin η

dη,

(7.35)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

u = i −∞

 

0

 

 

1

 

D

 

p2 + k2 cos η

 

and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I

 

1

 

eipx1 qH

(1)

(qh

) dp

 

[w−1+ ϕ0) + w−1ϕ0)]

dη.

(7.36)

= i

−∞

 

 

 

v

 

 

 

1

 

1

 

D

p2 + k2 cos η

 

The above condition for integral convergence is fulfilled for all points on the contour D (with the exception of points η = ±π ), because of the inequality Im(k2 cos η) < 0 that is valid there. For the points η = ±π and p =k, the convergence can be achieved by the temporary assumption that the wave number has a small imaginary part, k = k + ik with k > 0 and 0 < k 1. This assumption means a small attenuation of acoustic waves due to a small temporary admitted viscosity of the medium. After the transition to Equations (7.35) and (7.36), this assumption can be omitted. A special situation happens when η = ±π and the point p approaches the point p = k. As was explained above, the integration contour in Equation (7.21) skirts

under the branch point p = k. This means that under this branch point, the integration point is complex, and p = p + ip with p = k and p = Im( p) < 0. Thus, in this

special case, the above integral over the variable ξ1 is convergent due to the inequality Im( p) < 0.

The next work consists of a thorough analysis of the integral over the contour D. Its integrand possesses poles of two types. There are two poles η1 = ϕ0, η2 = −ϕ0

TEAM LinG


7.4 Transformation of Triple Integrals

179

(related to the functions w−1(η ϕ0)) and two other poles η3 = σ , η4 = −σ that are the zeros of the denominator p2 + k2 cos η, when

cos σ = −

p2

and σ = arccos −

p2

.

(7.37)

k2

k2

It is clear that

 

 

 

 

 

σ = π − arccos( p2/k2),

if | p2| ≤ k2,

 

(7.38)

where for the inverse cosine we take its principal values, 0 ≤ arccos(x) π . The

condition | p2| ≤ k2 is satisfied

for

the points p on

the real axis in the interval

k cos(2γ0) p k. In this case, 0 ≤ σ π .

 

In order to define σ for the values | p2| > k2, one should use the Euler formula

for the cosine function. Together with Equation (7.37) they lead to the equation

1

 

(e

+ e) = −

p2

 

 

 

 

 

.

(7.39)

2

 

k2

By using the replacement e= t, it is reduced to the quadratic equation with the solution

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

p2 ± (

 

.

 

 

 

 

 

σ

=

i ln

p22 k22

(7.40)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

k2

 

 

 

Now it is necessary to define the appropriate branches for the square root

 

 

 

 

 

 

p22 k22

and for the logarithm function. The square root has two branch points,

p

 

k2

. To make this function

single-valued, we introduce two

branch cuts

(2

= ±

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(−∞ ≤ p2 ≤ −k2 and k2 p2 ≤ ∞) and choose the branch where

p22 k22 ≥ 0

for the points on the upper (lower) side of the left (right) branch cut. (

 

 

To define the appropriate sign in front of the square root in Equation (7.40) and to define the appropriate branch of the logarithm, we use the conditions σ = π for p2 = k2 and σ = 0 for p2 = −k2. These conditions lead to the function

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

σ

=

i ln

p2 +

p22 k22

 

 

 

 

(7.41)

 

 

 

 

 

 

k2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

where ln(−1) = −and ln(1) = 0.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It follows from this equation that

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

i ln

p2 (

 

 

 

 

 

 

σ

=

π

+

p22 k22

 

, with p2

k2,

(7.42)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

k2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and

 

 

 

p2 + (

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

i ln

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

σ

=

p22 k22

,

 

 

 

with p2

≤ −

k2.

(7.43)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

k2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TEAM LinG


180 Chapter 7 Elementary Acoustic and Electromagnetic Edge Waves

Because the quantity p2 is real and the argument of the logarithm in Equations (7.42)

and (7.43) is always positive, we take the regular arithmetic branch for this logarithm, where ln(0) = −∞, ln(1) = 0, and ln() = +∞.

Now one can trace the position of the pole σ in the complex plane (η) as the function of the variable p in Equations (7.35) and (7.36). When this variable changes from p = −∞ to p = k cos(2γ0), the pole η3 = σ runs in the complex plane (η) along the imaginary axis Im(η) from η = +i∞ to η = 0. When the point p moves from p = k cos(2γ0) to p = k, the pole η3 = σ runs along the real axis Re(η) from η = 0 to η = π . When the point p moves from p = k to p = +∞, the pole η3 = σ runs down along the vertical line from η = π to η = π i∞. The location of the pole η3 = σ in the complex plane (η) is shown in Figure 7.5 by the thick solid line. The dashed line shows the location of the pole η4 = −σ .

To calculate the integrals over the contour D, we connect its branches with the additional contours F+ and F(Fig. 7.5), where Im(η) = A and Im(η) = −A, respectively. First, we place these contours at a large finite distance from the real axis (A 1) and apply the Cauchy residue theorem to the integrals over the closed contour C = D + F+ + F. Then the results of this theorem are extended to the case when the contours F+ and Fare shifted to the infinite distance (A → ∞). This procedure is realized in the following for the integrals

J (C)

= C

w−1+ ϕ0) w−1ϕ0)

sin η dη

(7.44)

 

u

 

 

p2 + k2 cos η

 

and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

J

(C)

=

 

w−1+ ϕ0) + w−1ϕ0)

dη.

(7.45)

 

 

v

 

 

C

p2 + k2 cos η

 

The basic details of this procedure are the same for both integrals. That is why we demonstrate these details only for the integral Ju and then bring the final result for Jv .

Figure 7.5 Integration contours in the complex plane (η).

TEAM LinG