222 |
4.3.2 General properties of stimulated scattering |
[Ref. p. 232 |
|
|
4.3.2.3.2 Stokes–anti-Stokes coupling |
|
The |
stimulated Stokes scattering can be impeded by simultaneous |
anti-Stokes scattering, |
ωA = ωL + ωo . The anti-Stokes process is depicted in Fig. 4.3.2a (dashed arrows) and “consumes” material excitation, so that (4.3.6) is not applicable. The corresponding four-wave interaction via χ(3)(−ωA; ωL, ωL, −ωS) is termed Stokes–anti-Stokes coupling and depicted in Fig. 4.3.2c. The significance of the process is determined by its wave vector mismatch ∆kA , depicted in the lower part of Fig. 4.3.2c, and the initial intensity ratio IA(0)/IS(0) (IA : anti-Stokes intensity). ∆kA is governed by the scattering angle and the color dispersion of the refractive index n(ω) of the medium since
|
ki = n(ωi) |
ωi |
; (i = A, L, S) . |
(4.3.8) |
|
c |
|
|
|
|
For a collinear geometry we simply have ∆kA = kA + kS − 2kL . For ∆kA = 0 and IA/IS = 1 , the inverse process of anti-Stokes scattering fully inhibits stimulated Stokes scattering. An example in this context is exact forward scattering in gases, where ∆kA is small, so that the observed weakness of SRS in exact forward direction is explained in this way. For a large mismatch, |∆kA| > 3 g IL , on the other hand, the Stokes–anti-Stokes coupling is negligible. This condition is always fulfilled for backward scattering so that simultaneous anti-Stokes scattering cannot perturb the stimulated Stokes process notably. For IA IS , the perturbation of Stokes scattering by antiStokes production is negligible, too. In this case the process of Fig. 4.3.2c is also called Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering, CARS, an important nonlinear spectroscopy (preferentially applied
for phase-matching geometries, ∆k 0 ).
A =
Outside Raman resonances the properties of Stokes–anti-Stokes coupling di er notably from the near-resonant case considered here.
4.3.2.3.3 Higher-order Stokes and anti-Stokes emission
For high conversion e ciency of the stimulated scattering the Stokes intensity IS becomes comparable to the incident radiation IL , and the material excitation is significant. As a consequence secondary processes show up, generating a cascade of higher-order Stokes and anti-Stokes lines with relative frequency shift ωo and decreasing intensity levels. Two mechanisms are relevant here:
1.stimulated Stokes scattering where the intense first-order Stokes component serves as the pump radiation for generating the second-order line and so forth;
2.coherent Stokes or anti-Stokes scattering o the material excitation generated by the primary Stokes scattering producing new frequency-shifted lines. The mechanism is e ected by wavevector mismatches of the individual processes.
The Stokes–anti-Stokes coupling discussed above is responsible for the generation of the firstorder anti-Stokes component. Higher-order Stokes scattering limits the energy conversion e ciency of first-order Stokes production. The higher-order stimulated scattering should be distinguished from higher-order spontaneous scattering since only a fundamental material transition is involved in the former case.
4.3.2.4 Transient stimulated scattering
The build-up of a material excitation in stimulated scattering involves the response time T2 (dephasing time) of the medium. When the pulse duration tp of the incident laser is comparable to or smaller than T2 , the interaction becomes less e cient and the actual gain of the stimulated Stokes