Файл: Computer systems and Vocational training.docx

cambridge-igcse-computer-science.pdf

7.http://www.tihe.org/courses/it141/manual/Using%20Information%20Technology%209th%20Complete%20Edition%202010.pdf

6 Course policy

This training course is organized in accordance with the requirements of the academic policy of S. Seifullin KATU (link to the site: ttps://kazatu.edu.kz/ru/pages/obucenie/akademiceskaa-politika).

It is recommended to pay attention to the possible consequences in case of failure to meet academic requirements and low attendance.

In the course of studying this discipline, the teacher and students must follow the code of academic integrity of participants in the educational process adopted at the university https://kazatu.edu.kz/ru/pages/obucenie/akademiceskaa-politika (paragraph 7).

The academic policy of the university and the code of academic integrity of participants in the educational process are freely available on the university website. All students are given equal opportunities to participate in the discussion of educational topics in the classroom. Everyone has the right to ask questions and receive answers on the educational topics stated in the syllabus. The originality of thinking, the creative approach of students in the performance of the teacher's tasks are welcomed. All students are required to comply with the academic culture of behavior, demonstrating mutual respect for each other. Students with special educational needs can exercise the right to an individual approach to learning.
7. Student’s Achievement Assessment Policy

Educational achievements (knowledge, skills, skills and competencies) of students are evaluated in points on a 100-point scale, corresponding to the letter system adopted in international practice with a digital equivalent (positive ratings, as they decrease, from "A" to "D," and "unsatisfactory" - "FX," "F,") and assessments according to the traditional system.

The assessment policy of educational achievements of students meets the requirements presented in the Academic Policy in paragraph 9 on the university website (link to the website: https://kazatu.edu.kz/ru/pages/obucenie/akademiceskaa-politika).
7.1 Criteria for assessing the educational achievements of students

Gradingbylettersystem	Digital equivalent of points	% content	Assessment according to the traditional system	NominationCriteria
А	4,0	95-100	Excellent	Grade A is given in the case when a complete, detailed answer to the question is given, the totality of conscious knowledge about the object is shown, which manifests itself in the free operation of concepts, the ability to distinguish its essential and non-essential features, cause-and-effect relationships. And etc.
А-	3,67	90-94		Grade A- is given in the case when a complete, detailed answer to the question is given, the totality of conscious knowledge about the object is shown, the main provisions of the topic are convincingly disclosed; the answer shows a clear structure, a logical sequence that reflects the essence of the disclosed concepts, theories, phenomena. Knowledge about the object is demonstrated against the background of understanding it in the system of this science and interdisciplinary connections. The answer is stated in the literary language in terms of science. There may be errors in the definition of concepts, corrected by the student independently in the process of answering. And etc.
В+	3,33	85-89	Good	Grade B+ is given in the case when students are given a complete, detailed answer to the question posed, the main provisions of the topic are convincingly disclosed in the answer, a clear structure, a logical sequence reflecting the essence of the disclosed concepts, theories, phenomena can be traced. The answer is stated in the literary language in terms of science. The answer contains flaws corrected by the student with the help of the teacher.
B	3,0	80-84		Grade B is given in the case when a complete, detailed answer to the question is given; the ability to identify essential and non-essential features, causal relationships is shown. The answer is clearly structured, logical, written in literary language in terms of science. There may be shortcomings or minor errors corrected by the student with the help of the teacher.
В-	2,67	75-79		Grade B- is given in the case when a detailed answer is given to the question posed; the ability to identify essential and non-essential features, causal relationships is shown. The answer is clearly structured, logical, stated in terms of science. However, minor errors or shortcomings were made, corrected by the student with the help of leading questions.
С+	2,33	70-74		T Grade C+ grade is given in the case when a complete, but not sufficiently consistent answer to the question is given, but at the same time, the ability to identify essential and non-essential signs and cause-and-effect relationships is shown. The answer is logical and stated in terms of science. 1-2 mistakes can be made in the definition of basic concepts that the student found it difficult to correct on his own.
C	2,0	65-69	Satisfactorily	Grade C is given when an insufficiently complete and insufficiently detailed answer is given. The logic and sequence of presentation have violations. Mistakes were made in the disclosure of concepts, the use of terms. The student is not able to independently identify essential and non-essential features and cause-and-effect relationships. The student can concretize generalized knowledge, proving their main provisions with examples only with the help of a teacher. Speechdesignrequiresamendments, correction.
С-	1,67	60-64		Grade C- is given in the case when an incomplete answer is given, the logic, and the sequence of presentation have significant violations. Gross mistakes were made in determining the essence of the disclosed concepts, theories, phenomena, due to the student's misunderstanding of their essential and non-essential features and relationships. There are no conclusions in the answer. The ability to reveal specific manifestations of generalized knowledge is not shown. Speechdesignrequiresamendments, correction.
D+	1,33	55-59		Grade D+ score is given when an incomplete answer is given. There is an inconsistency in the presentation. The teacher finds it difficult to prove. A lot of significant errors in the definitions of terms, concepts, characterization of facts, phenomena. There are no inputs in the response. Speech is illiterate. When answering additional questions, the Trainer begins to realize the existence of a connection between knowledge only after the prompt of the teacher.
D	1,0	50-54		Grade D is given when an incomplete answer is given, which is disparate knowledge on the topic of the question with significant errors in the definitions. There is fragmentation, illogical presentation. The teacher does not realize the connection of this concept, theory, phenomenon with other objects of the module (discipline). There are no conclusions, concretization and proof of presentation. Speech is illiterate. Additional and clarifying questions of the teacher do not lead to the correction of the student's answer not only to the question posed, but also to other questions of the module (discipline).
FХ	0,5	25-49	Unsatisfactory	The rating "unsatisfactory" corresponds to the letter FX, F, which has a digital equivalent of 0 and a percentage of 0-49. This grade is given if the student found gaps in the knowledge of the basic material provided for by the program, did not master more than half of the module (discipline) program, made fundamental mistakes in the answers, did not complete individual tasks provided for by the forms of current, intermediate and final control, did not worked through all the basic literature provided by the program.
F	0	0-24

---

Scale for assessing students' knowledge

Scale for assessing students' knowledgeLetter grade	Digital equivalent of points	Percentage of points	Evaluation by the traditional system
А	4,0	95-100	Excellent
А-	3,67	90-94
В+	3,33	85-89	Good
В	3,0	80-84
В-	2,67	75-79
С+	2,33	70-74
С	2,0	65-69	Satisfactorily
С-	1,67	60-64
Д+	1,33	55-59
Д-	1,0	50-54
FХ	0,5	25-49	Unsatisfactorily
F	0	0-24

If the student received "FX", the student has the opportunity to retake the final control. Students can retake the course/module programs (free of charge). During the period of intermediate certification, students are allowed to retake the exam (FX) in the academic discipline (module) no more than two times. If a student received an “unsatisfactory” grade (FX) for the third time, he will be expelled from the university and lose the opportunity to enroll in this discipline again.

If the students received an "F” they can enroll in this academic discipline / module, they must attend all types of studies (summer semester) and they must complete all types of study work according to the program and retake the final control.

Individual approach to teaching students with special educational needs
When training students with special educational needs (hereinafter SEN), the choice of training methods is carried out by the teacher and is determined in each individual case by the goals of training. The initial level of available knowledge, skills, abilities, the level of professional training of the teacher, methodological and material technical support, peculiarities of information perception of students, based on their availability for students with SEN.

In the process of training students with special educational needs using distance-learning technologies, there is an opportunity to individualize the training trajectory of these categories of citizens. What implies the individualization of the content, methods, pace of the student's educational activity, the ability to monitor the specific actions of the student with SEN when solving specific tasks, if necessary, the required corrections are made in the activity of the student and the teacher.

---

In the educational process, the teacher can actively use various forms of organization of online and offline classes, including: virtual lectures, discussion of discipline mastering issues within the framework of chats, webinars, seminars, joint work with the use of project activity technologies with the possibility of including all participants in the educational process and work actively on subjects studied while mastering the discipline (module).

When teaching students with disabilities, teachers must ensure compliance with the basic principles of accessibility when creating educational materials (understandability and predictability of content, indication of alternative text for images, simplified speech, summary of material, etc.).

---