Файл: профилактика ИСМП в акушерстве.pdf

ВУЗ: Не указан

Категория: Не указан

Дисциплина: Не указана

Добавлен: 12.08.2021

Просмотров: 1853

Скачиваний: 7

ВНИМАНИЕ! Если данный файл нарушает Ваши авторские права, то обязательно сообщите нам.
background image

29. Schaberg DR, Culver DH, Gaynes RP. Major trends in the microbial etiology of nosocomial infection. 

Am J Med

1991; 91(Suppl):S72–S75.

30. CDC. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System report, data summary from January 1992 –

June 2001, issued August 2001. 

Am J Infect Control

2001; 6:404–421.

31. Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM et al. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of

24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. 

Clin Infect Dis

2004; 39:309–317.

32. O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA et al. Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related In-

fections, 2011. – Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Healthcare Infection Control Practices
Advisory Committee (HICPAC), 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/pdf/guidelines/bsi-guidelines-2011.pdf.

33. Shukla H, Ferrara A. Rapid estimation of insertional length of umbilical catheters in newborns. 

Am J Dis Child

1986; 140:786–788.

34. Craig AR, Ubhi T, Reece A, Wright IMR. A new formula for the correct positioning of umbilical arterial catheters

in very low birth weight infants / PSANZ 4th Annual Congress, Brisbane, Australia, March 2000; p. 294.

35. Wright IM, Owers M, Wagner M. The umbilical arterial catheter: a formula for improved positioning in the very

low birth weight infant. 

Pediatr Crit Care Med

2008; 9:498–501.

36. Hawser SP, Douglas LJ. Biofilm formation by Candida species on the surface of catheter materials in vitro.

Infect Immun

1994; 62:915–921.

37. Raad II, Luna M, Khalil SA et al. The relationship between the thrombotic and infectious complications of cen-

tral venous catheters. 

JAMA

1994; 271:1014–1016.

38. Zhu Y, Weiss EC, Otto et al. Staphylococcus aureus metabolism in a biofilm: the influence of arginine on polysac-

charide intercellular adhesin synthesis, biofilm formation, and pathogenesis. 

Infect Immun

2007; 75:4219–4226.

39. Murga R, Miller JM, Donlan RM. Biofilm formation by gram-negative bacteria on central venous catheter con-

nectors: effect of conditioning films in a laboratory model. 

J Clin Microbiol

2001; 39:2294–2297.

40. Douglas LJ. Candida biofilms and their role in infection. 

Trends Microbiol

2003; 11:30–36.

41. Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. 

Clin Microbiol

Rev

2002; 15:167–193.

42. Biofilms: microbial life on surfaces. 

Emerg Infect Dis

2002; 8:881–890.

43. Banin E, Brady KM, Greenberg EP. Chelator-induced dispersal and killing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells in

a biofilm. 

Appl Environ Microbiol 

2006; 72:2064–2069.

44. Ozerdem Akpolat N, Elci S et al. The effects of magnesium, calcium and EDTA on slime production by Staphy-

lococcus epidermidis strains. 

Folia Microbiol (Praha)

2003; 48:649–653.

45. Branchini ML, Pfaller MA, Rhine-Chalberg J et al. Genotypic variation and slime production among blood and

catheter isolates of Candida parapsilosis. 

J Clin Microbiol

1994; 32:452–456.

46. Bong JJ, Kite P, Wilco MH, McMahon MJ. Prevention of catheter related bloodstream infection by silver ion to

phoretic central venous catheters: a randomised controlled trial. 

J Clin Pathol

2003; 56:731–735.

47. Hagau N, Studnicska D, Gavrus RL et al. Central venous catheter colonization and catheter-related bloodstream

infections in critically ill patients: a comparison between standard and silver-integrated catheters. 

Eur J Anaes-

thesiol

2009; 26:752–758.

48. Hanna H, Benjamin R, Chatzinikolaou I et al. Long-term silicone central venous catheters impregnated with

minocycline and rifampin decrease rates of catheter-related bloodstream infection in cancer patients: a
prospective randomized clinical trial. 

J Clin Oncol

2004; 22:3163–3171.

49. Raad I, Darouiche R, Dupuis J et al. Central venous catheters coated with minocycline and rifampin for the

prevention of catheter-related colonization and bloodstream infections. A randomized, double-blind trial.
The Texas Medical Center Catheter Study Group. 

Ann Intern Med

1997; 127:267–274.

50. Bassetti S, Hu J, D’Agostino RB Jr., Sherertz RJ. Prolonged antimicrobial activity of a catheter containing

chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine extends protection against catheter infections in vivo. 

Antimicrob Agents

Chemother 

2001; 45:1535–1538.

51. Stephens R, Mythen M, Kallis P et al. Two episodes of life-threatening anaphylaxis in the same patient to a

chlorhexidine-sulphadiazine-coated central venous catheter. 

Br J Anaesth

2001; 87:306–308.

52. Jee R, Nel L, Gnanakumaran G et al. Four cases of anaphylaxis to chlorhexidine impregnated central venous

catheters: a case cluster or the tip of the iceberg? 

Br J Anaesth

2009; 103:614–615.

53. Sheth NK, Franson TR, Rose HD et al. Colonization of bacteria on polyvinyl chloride and Teflon intravascular

catheters in hospitalized patients. 

J Clin Microbiol

1983; 18:1061–1063.

54. Tully JL, Friedland GH, Baldini LM, Goldmann DA. Complications of intravenous therapy with steel needles

and Teflon® catheters: a comparative study. 

Am J Med

1981; 70:702–706.

55. Sheth NK, Franson TR, Rose HD et al. Colonization of bacteria on polyvinyl chloride and Teflon intravascular

catheters in hospitalized patients. 

J Clin Microbiol

1983; 18:1061–1063.

56. Maki DG, Ringer M. Evaluation of dressing regimens for prevention of infection with peripheral intravenous

catheters: gauze, a transparent polyurethane dressing, and an iodophor-transparent dressing. 

JAMA

1987;

258:2396–2403.

Раздел 4

81

Профилактика ИСМП при инвазивных вмешательствах


background image

57. Mehall JR, Saltzman DA, Jackson RJ, Smith SD. Fibrin sheath enhances central venous catheter infection. 

Crit

Care Med

2002; 30:908–912.

58. Hawser SP, Douglas LJ. Biofilm formation by Candida species on the surface of catheter materials in vitro.

Infect Immun

1994; 62: 915–921.

59. Garland JS, Alex CP, Henrickson KJ et al. A vancomycin-heparin lock solution for prevention of nosocomial

bloodstream infection in critically ill neonates with peripherally inserted central venous catheters: a prospec-
tive, randomized trial. 

Pediatrics

2005; 116:e198–205.

60. Henrickson KJ, Axtell RA, Hoover SM et al. Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections and throm-

botic events in immunocompromised children by the use of vancomycin/ciprofloxacin/ heparin flush solution:
A randomized, multicenter, double-blind trial. 

J Clin Oncol

2000; 18:1269–1278.

61. Management of newborn problems: A guide for doctors, nurses and midwifes. – : WHO, 2005.
62. Arifeen SE, Mullany LC, Shah R et al. The effect of cord cleansing with chlorhexidine on neonatal mortality in

rural : a community-based, cluster-randomised trial. 

Lancet

2012; 379: 1022–1028.

63. Chaiyakunapruk N, Veenstra DL, Lipsky BA, Saint S. Chlorhexidine compared with povidoneiodine solution

for vascular catheter-site care:a meta-analysis. 

Ann Intern Med

2002; 136:792–801.

64. Chapman AK, Aucott SW, Milstone AM. Safety of chlorhexidine gluconate used for skin antisepsis in the

preterm infant. 

J Perinatol

2012; 32:4–9.

65. Shah PS, Kalyn A, Satodia P et al. A randomized, controlled trial of heparin versus placebo infusion to prolong

the usability of peripherally placed percutaneous central venous catheters (PCVCs) in neonates: the HIP (He-
parin Infusion for PCVC) study. 

Pediatrics

2007; 119:e284–e291.

66. Birch P, Ogden S, Hewson M. A randomised, controlled trial of heparin in total parenteral nutrition to prevent

sepsis associated with neonatal long lines: the Heparin in Long Line Total Parenteral Nutrition (HILLTOP) trial.

Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 

2010; 95:F252–F257.

67. David RJ, Merten DF, Anderson JC, Gross S. Prevention of umbilical artery catheter clots with heparinized in-

fusates. 

Dev Pharmacol Ther

1981; 2:117–126.

68. Ankola PA, Atakent YS. Effect of adding heparin in very low concentration to the infusate to prolong the pa-

tency of umbilical artery catheters. 

Am J Perinatol

1993; 10:229–232.

69. Horgan MJ, Bartoletti A, Polansky S et al. Effect of heparin infusates in umbilical arterial catheters on frequency

of thrombotic complications. 

J Pediatr

1987; 111:774–778.

70. Band JD, Maki DG. Steel needles used for intravenous therapy: morbidity in patients with hematologic ma-

lignancy. 

Arch Intern Med

1980; 140:31–34.

71. Garland J, Henrickson K, Maki D et al. The 2002 Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee Cen-

ters for Disease Control and Prevention guideline for prevention of intravascular device-related infection. 

Pe-

diatrics

2002; 110:1009–1013.

72. Almuneef M, Memish ZA, Balkhy HH et al. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in a pediatric intensive care unit

in Saudi Arabia: a 30-month prospective surveillance

. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

2004; 25:753–758.

73. Safdar N, Dezfulian C, Collard HR, Saint S. Clinical and economic consequences of ventilator-associated pneu-

monia: a systematic review. 

Crit Care Med

2005; 33:2184–2193.

74. Drews MB, Ludwig AC, Leititis JU, Daschner FD. Low birth weight and nosocomial infection of neonates in a

neonatal intensive care unit. 

J Hosp Infect

1995; 30:65–72.

75. Ford-Jones EL, Mindorff CM, Langley JM et al. Epidemiologic study of 4684 hospital-acquired infections in pe-

diatric patients. 

Pediatr Infect Dis J

1989; 8:668–675.

76. Hemming VG, Overall JC Jr, Britt MR. Nosocomial infections in a newborn intensive-care unit: Results of forty-

one months of surveillance. 

N Engl J Med

1976; 294:1310–1316.

77. Van der Zwet WC, Kaiser AM, van Elburg RM et al. Nosocomial infections in a Dutch neonatal intensive care

unit: surveillance study with definitions for infection specifically adapted for neonates

. J Hosp Infect 

2005;

61:300–311.

78. Garland JS. Strategies to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia in neonates. 

Clin Perinatol

2010; 37:629–643.

79. Richards MJ, Edwards JR, Culver DH, Gaynes RP. Nosocomial infections in combined medical-surgical intensive

care units in the . 

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

2000; 21: 510–515.

80. Craven DE. Epidemiology of ventilator associated pneumonia. 

Chest

2000; 117(Suppl 2):186S–187S.

81. Van Saene H, Peric M, De  et al. Pneumonia during mechanical ventilation. 

Anestiol Intenziv Med

2004; 15:89–

100. 

82. Heyland D, Cook D,  L et al. The attributable morbidity and mortality of ventilator associated pneumonia in

the critically ill patient. The Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. 

Am J Respir Crit Care Med

1999; 159:1249–1256.

83. Foglia E, Meier MD, Elward A. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit

patients. 

Clin Microbiol Rev

2007, 20:409–425.

84. Kunis KA, Puntillo KA. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in the ICU: its pathophysiology, risk factors, and pre-

vention. 

Am J Nurs

2003; 133:64AA–64GG.

Раздел 4

82

Профилактика ИСМП при инвазивных вмешательствах


background image

85. Apisarnthanarak A, Holzmann-Pazgal G, Hamvas A et al. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in extremely

preterm neonates in a neonatal intensive care unit: characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes. 

Pediatrics 

2003;

112:1283–1289. 

86. Muscedere J, Dodek P, Keenan S et al. VAP Guidelines Committee and the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group.

Comprehensive evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for ventilator-associated pneumonia: prevention.

J Crit Care

2008; 23:126–137.

87. Masterton RG, Galloway A, French G et al. Guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia

in the : report of the working party on hospital-acquired pneumonia of the British Society for Antimicrobial
Chemotherapy. 

J Antimicrob Chemother

2008; 62:5–34. 

88. Foglia E, Meier MD, Elward A. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit

patients. 

Clin Microbiol Rev

2007; 20:409–425.

89. Elward AM, Warren DK, Fraser VJ. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in pediatric intensive care unit patients:

risk factors and outcomes. 

Pediatrics

2002; 109:758–764.

90. Nseir S, Zerimech F, Fournier C et al. Continuous control of tracheal cuff pressure and microaspiration of gastric

contents in critically ill patients. 

Am J Respir Crit Care Med

2011, 184:1041–1047.

91. Coffin SE, Klompas M, Classen D et al. Strategies to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia in acute care

hospitals. 

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

2008; 29(Suppl 1):S31–S40.

92. Smyth ET, McIlvenny G, Enstone JE et al. Four country healthcare associated infection prevalence survey 2006:

overview of the results. 

J Hosp Infect 

2008; 69:230–248.

93. Reducing harm to patients from health care associated infection: The role of surveillance / Eds. Cruickshank

M, Ferguson J. – Australian Commission for Safety and Quality in Health Care, 2008.

94. Hidron AI, Edwards JR, Patel J et al. NHSN annual update: Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with

healthcare-associated infections: Annual summary of data reported to the national healthcare safety network
at the centers for disease control and prevention, 2006–2007. 

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

2008; 29:996–1011.

95. Tambyah PA, Knasinski V, Maki DG. The direct costs of nosocomial catheter-associated urinary tract infection

in the era of managed care. 

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

2002; 23:27–31.

96. Leone M, Albanese J, Garnier F et al. Risk factors of nosocomial catheter-associated urinary tract infection in

a polyvalent intensive care unit. 

Intensive Care Med

2003; 29:1077–1080.

97. Tissot E, Limat S, Cornette C, Capellier G. Risk factors for catheter-associated bacteriuria in a medical intensive

care unit. 

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis

2001; 20:260–262.

98. Cardosi RJ, Cardosi RP, Grendys EC Jr et al. Infectious urinary tract morbidity with prolonged bladder catheter-

ization after radical hysterectomy. 

Obstet Gynecol

2003; 189:380–384.

99. Jacono JJ, Talamelli CL. Nosocomial urinary tract infection in catheterized patients. 

Infect Control Can

1988;

3:16–20.

100.Munasinghe RL, Yazdani H, Siddique M, Hafeez W. Appropriateness of use of indwelling urinary catheters in

patients admitted to the medical service. 

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

2001; 22:647–649.

101.Gould CV, Umscheid CA, Agarwal RK et al., Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HIC-

PAC). Guideline for Prevention of Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infections 2009. – Healthcare Infection
Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC), National Institutes of Health & Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, 2009.

102.Srinivasan A, Karchmer T, Richards A et al. A prospective trial of a novel, silicone-based, silver-coated foley catheter

for the prevention of nosocomial urinary tract infections. 

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

2006; 27:38–43.

103.Schumm K, Lam TB. Types of urethral catheters for management of short-term voiding problems in hospi-

talised adults. 

Cochrane Database Syst Rev

2008; (2):CD004013.

104.Johnson JR, Kuskowski MA, Wilt TJ. Systematic review: Antimicrobial urinary catheters to prevent catheter-

associated urinary tract infection in hospitalized patients. 

Ann Intern Med

2006; 144:116–126.

105.Niel-Weise BS, Arend SM, van den Broek PJ. Is there evidence for recommending silver-coated urinary catheters

in guidelines? 

J Hosp Infect

2002; 52:81–87.

106.Crnich CJ, Drinka PJ. Does the composition of urinary catheters influence clinical outcomes and the results of

research studies? 

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

2007; 28:102–103.

107.Pien EC, Hume KE, Pien FD. Gastrostomy tube infections in a community hospital. 

Am J Infect Control

1996;

24:353–358.

108.Herlick SJ, Vogt C, Pangman V, Fallis W. Comparison of open versus closed systems of intermittent enteral

feeding in two long-term care facilities. 

Nutr Clin Pract

2000; 15:287–298.

109.Wagner DR, Elmore MF, Knoll DM. Evaluation of "closed" vs "open" systems for the delivery of peptide-based

enteral diets. 

JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr

1994; 18:453–457.

110.McKinlay J, Wildgoose A, Wood W et al. The effect of system design on bacterial contamination of enteral tube

feeds. 

J Hosp Infect

2001; 47:138–142.

111.World Health Organization in collaboration with Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Safe preparation, storage and handling of powdered infant formula: Guidelines. – WHO, 2006.

Раздел 4

83

Профилактика ИСМП при инвазивных вмешательствах


background image

112.FDA. Health professionals letter on Enterobacter sakazakn infections associated with use of powdered (dry)

infant formulas in neonatal intensive care units. http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodSafety/ProductSpecificInfor-
mation/InfantFormula/AlertsSafetyInformation/ucm111299.htm.

113.Anderton A, Aidoo KE. Decanting – a source of contamination of enteral feeds? 

Clin Nutr

1990; 9:157–162.

114.Anderton A, Aidoo KE. The effect of handling procedures on microbial contamination of enteral feeds – a

comparison of the use of sterile vs non-sterile gloves. 

J Hosp Infect

1991; 17:297–301.

115.Patchell CJ, Anderton A, MacDonald A et al. Bacterial contamination of enteral feeds. 

Arch Dis Child

1994;

70:327–330.

116.Anderton A. Microbial contamination of enteral tube feeds – how can we reduce the risk? 

Penlines 

2000; 16:3–8.

117.Anderton A, Nwoguh CE. Re-use of enteral feeding tubes – a potential hazard to the patient? A study of the

efficiency of a representative range of cleaning and disinfection procedures. 

J Hosp Infect

1991; 18:131–138.

118.Grunow JE, Christenson JC, Moutos D. Contamination of enteral nutrition systems during prolonged inter-

mittent use. 

JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr

1989; 13:23–25.

119.Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. Device Bulletin: Single-use medical devices:implica-

tions and consequences of reuse DB2006(04). – : Department of Health, 2006. http://www.mhra.gov.uk/
home/groups/dtsiac/documents/publication/con2025021.pdf.

120.Infection: prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections in primary and community care. Clinical

Guideline. Methods, evidence and recommendations. – : National Clinical Guideline Centre, 2012.

121.National Patient Safety Agency. Promoting safer measurement and administration of liquid medicines via

oral and other enteral routes. – NPSA, 2007. http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/EasySiteWeb/getresource.axd?As-
setID=60065&type=full&servicetype=Attachment.

122. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health (UK). Surgical site infection: Prevention and

treatment of surgical site infection. — London: RCOG Press, 2008. 

123.Gilstrap LC, Cunningham FG, VanDorsten JP. Operative Obstetrics. – McGraw-Hill, 2002.
124.Maiwald M, Widmer AF. Are alcohol gels better than liquid hand rubs? 

Crit Care 

2007; 11:418.

125.Darouiche MD, Wall MJ. Chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for surgical-site antisepsis. 

J Med 

2010;

362:18–26.

126.Widmer AE, Dangel M. Alcohol-based handrub: evaluation of technique and microbiological efficacy with in-

ternational infection control professionals. 

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 

2004; 25:207–209.

127.Tanner J, Parkinson H. Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection. 

Cochrane Database Syst Rev 

2006;

(3):CD003087.

Раздел 4

84

Профилактика ИСМП при инвазивных вмешательствах


background image

РАЦИОНАЛЬНОЕ ПРИМЕНЕНИЕ АНТИБИОТИКОВ

Антимикробные препараты – лекарственные средства, основу которых составляют химические со-

единения природного или искусственного происхождения, обладающие избирательной активностью 
в отношении микроорганизмов (бактерий, вирусов, грибов и простейших) [1]. Наибольшее значение в
контексте ИСМП имеют антибактериальные препараты – антибиотики, которым в данном разделе уде-
лено основное внимание.

Цель рационального применения антибиотиков – оптимизация назначения антимикробных средств

для снижения антибиотикорезистентности, улучшения исходов и безопасности лечения пациентов, а
также повышения экономической обоснованности терапии.

Даже в одной стране между медицинскими учреждениями существуют значительные различия в под-

ходах к назначению антибиотиков, особенно антибиотиков широкого спектра действия [2]. Результаты
исследований показывают, что почти в 50% случаев назначение антибиотиков не оправданно, при этом
расходы на антибиотики поглощают 30% от всех расходов на медикаменты [3–6]. Особенно важно внед-
рение рационального использования антибиотиков в отделениях интенсивной терапии и реанимации.
В этих отделениях пациентам, особенно новорожденным, часто и  длительно назначаются антибиотики,
нередко без обоснованных показаний. 

Анализ эффективности назначений антибиотиков проводится в медицинских учреждениях на осно-

вании данных историй болезни, электронного контроля назначений лекарственных средств и опроса па-
циентов. Оцениваются частота назначений антибиотиков, выбор препаратов, дозы, продолжительность
терапии.

С позиций эпидемиологического контроля в акушерских стационарах особенно важно рассмотреть

вопросы антибиотикопрофилактики у женщин и детей.

Антибиотикопрофилактика при проведении кесарева сечения

Послеродовые инфекционные осложнения являются одной из главных причин материнской заболе-

ваемости и смертности. Кесарево сечение наиболее часто по сравнению с другими хирургическими про-
цедурами приводит к послеоперационным инфекционным осложнениям [8–10]. В настоящее время при

85

ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕ 

АНТИБИОТИКОВ И 

АНТИБИОТИКОРЕЗИСТЕНТНОСТЬ 

Раздел 

5

Стратегия рационального использования антибиотиков у женщин и новорожденных включает

следующие компоненты [7]:

разработку и внедрение протоколов назначения антибиотиков и регулярное их обновление
по мере получения данных доказательной медицины с привлечением врачей различных спе-
циальностей (клинических фармакологов, инфекционистов, микробиологов);

обучение врачей рациональному использованию антибиотиков;

внедрение электронных формуляров в стационарах с обоснованными ограничениями назначе-
ния антибиотиков;

назначение антибиотиков только по показаниям и в соответствии с инструкциями;

преимущественное назначение антибиотиков первого ряда;

ограничение использования антибиотиков резерва;

использование в первую очередь оральных форм антибиотиков;

оценку чувствительности патогенов к антибиотикам;

информирование женщин о назначении антибиотиков им и/или их детям;

регулярный мониторинг и контроль назначения антибиотиков.